Actually regarding this line- 1. The parties agree that ---- ---- on Broker’s behalf has procured for Owner a tenant. This was just put in by landlord. My original line was Agent --- ----, of brokerage ----- ----- has procured tenant --- ---- for the owner. He took that out and changed it-not...
Nice. I thought so. So it does say my name on the contract "1. The parties agree that ---- ---- on Broker’s behalf has procured for Owner a tenant." The part that's ---- ---- is my name. Sounds like theres no need for my name to be on here-its just asking for trouble?
And here's another...
Well I was the one who procured the tenant, but we generally get paid from our principal brokers. So yes there is monetary benefit coming from the landlord paid to my broker who pays me a split. In fact all the commission agreements are generally between landlord and the principal broker without...
This contract has been going back and forth for past few days. The lease was already signed last week.This is the latest version that was put out today and is supposed to be signed tomorrow.
Okay hold on. By the way, question is do I even need to put my name in the contract at all if Im only the agent. My agreement is really with my sponsoring broker. Is there even a need to put my name in this?
This is an important one that needs a answer by tomorrow morning. Say I got an agreement to be paid a commission for a lease over a period of years. The agreement is that the commission will be paid as long as the tenant is there. A commission will be pro rated to be paid at the anniversary or...