Search results

No. Could still be the friend. Stick to keeping things in writing.

* You need to limit yourself to facts. Cold hard facts with no "feeling" or "opinion" words. * You need to lead with the most important thing(s) first. If details are wanted or needed, elaborate later. See example at bottom. * Baseball, not hockey. Baseball has clearly defined roles...

Did they have to evacuate the area? Was it on a weekend? If so, that can account for some of the cost. (One of my neighbors did the same thing a few years back. I came home from church to find half the neighborhood evacuated.)

Gah! Please reduce this to bullet points with white space. And get to the point quickly. Good for the judge, ordering a drug test. Way to cut to the chase, and see who's less credible. Hint: if you don't use drugs, it's not a problem, and the negative test makes the one accusing you seem...

That's revisionist history. He switched parties because he was consistently anti-slavery. He deserves more credit for his pre-Civil War politics as Speaker of the House and Governor of Massachusetts. Yes, he should never have been appointed general, having absolutely no military background...

The duct tape prom attire contest is very popular - Why not a duct tape detention award?

There should be more statues dedicated to Nathaniel Prentice Banks.

Forgive for being blunt, but: YOU are the RESPONDENT. Therefore most of what you are blathering about is irrelevant. The priority of any respondent should be to RESPOND to the issue that they are being brought to court on. Your letter(s) and negative comments about your ex will derail you...

My elderly neighbor told one would be scammer claiming to be her grandson ISO bail that, "Well, you probably did something very bad. And I hope that they keep you locked up for a very long time."

Max was a frat boy... Anyone surprised?!

My first thought was that it would difficult for someone his size to move easily in an air plane; he's a little big to be a flight attendant. (Not a slam on his size. Just that it's a cramped space to work in.)

The WHY helps us occasionally make sense of the senseless. I am always curious to see if there is a pattern behind the story. Sometimes it does matter, legally, to have context - to determine whether this person needs psychiatric help, for example, or just makes horrible choices. I'm inclined...

Not everyone is so privileged as you seem to assume. Nor should onus be on the person accused to prove their innocence. Just wait until it happens to you or your family.

And what you didn't do the crime? What if you have only been accused, and have not had your day in court? We have the standard of "presumed innocent" for a reason.

Perhaps that is because there is so much fault to be found. Do you think the judge will be more generous? No. That is why you are here and elsewhere ranting, because a judge wasn't as generous and forgiving as you'd like. We CANNOT provide answers that will satisfy you because you cannot...

Well... there's your answer. He still wants to control you.

I agree. I know the only reason my ex is current is that it goes through the state. Actually, the first time the state intercepted anything, he took me back to court to demand that it be returned, and child support be set to zero. LOL. Yeah, that was a short hearing.

True. But at one point she applied. Hopefully she will clarify where she is still receiving assistance.

I am sorry that your ex considers food for his child(ren) to be nonsense. Perhaps if you were feeling more financially secure (like, he paid for lunches), you would not have applied and qualified for these benefits.

Look, the forum is basically a private club. No one has the inherent right to be a member of a private club. You can try to contact the site and inquire as to why you were banned. Most of your public posts seem inoffensive, but I have no idea what the site's TOS are. If you want to make them...