Search results

and going pro se is a tough proposition to begin with. You are more likely to be listened to if you find another attorney which you like.

well at least one juror held out for a day or two before changing their verdict/ mind.

Yes, and people wonder why no one wants to become police officers even with 10-15k sign on bonuses. No one in their right mind with other options would want to be a police officer. Don't call the police to be first responders or come to aid. Call the police to come pick up the bodies.

come on man, lots of Let's Go Brandon, in the outskirts of those big cities. I think it deadlocks too and a mistrial, retrial will happen. I think they may try one more time and then say forget it when another jury deadlocks.

such as a duty owed, or a negligence that was provable broken in order to proceed in personal injury claims

Frivolous lawsuits are frivolous and will not be filed by a normal responsible attorney.

My dogs would bite the crap out of them monkeys.

Yes, I doubt @army judge received 1% from the actual driver who caused the accident. I would assume he picked up the automobile manufactures in his case which made up the difference or iirc he stated that they picked up malpractice against the treating doctors? That is great but if this was to...

Right, but I am sure he had more than state mins. but you never know

You are bais but there is no intentional rant about the insurance industry intended. We still have FREE choice to pick the insurance companies you want or that best help your family.

True but wouldn't you want fair compensation for your injuries? against someone who knows how to work the system? Isn't there a social duty to limit idiots like this who work the system.

You had to identify deeper pockets than the negligent driver who hit you. Just because you won a multi million dollar verdict doesn't mean that it is collectible. Certainly not collectible against the driver who caused the accident and certainly not all collectible in a post tort reform...

Love how you all say how posters don't understand anything. Awesome. Tell you what, I do not know how much insurance you carry. I do not care but lets say you carry 300/500 and 300 UIM and work hard, have assets. You get hit by a state min insurance driver who only carries the state min. They...

Yeah, sigh Spoken like a true insurance man. The whole part of you pay for the insurance and the DUTY is to your insured NOT the 25k insurer and its policy limits.

Yeah, well. It depends upon how much fight you have in you. These companies are not going to magically give you UIM for being on the hook for being hit by a state min. driver. It is adversarial and depending on the insurance company becomes tug of war to get the UIM. They don't just say here is...

True statement, my friend. True Statement.

Yes, I can not believe this happens but it does, if the borrows credit is good enough to get expensive vehicles all they have to carry is the state min insurance. So you have a Bentley rolling around with 25k liability limits, total said Bentley as you have made 2 payments. You get said Bentley...

Naw, Army Judge you do not see what I am saying. I wasn't specifically talking about the liability limits. I was referring to people who have expensive rides 80+k and can for an example run into a building. Well they get a 76k check for their ride (since it was totaled) while the business owner...

This applies to all states, when insurance companies write policies on 80+k vehicles and the owners only want state min. liability limits, does this ever send off any red flags? I have seen or heard about people buying very expensive rides running state min. insurance. Totaling out their 80+k...

Yes especially if she called you, that makes me think it is small claims. I would check with an attorney in your area since you were not served with an actual complaint.