Search results

I would take the hand book to an attorney,depending on the state,and the wording in the handbook it could be a breach of an implied contract. The laws vary from state to state. The points should not be taken if the absence is excused.

No problem Professor like the motto says: the Green Hornet, his aid Kato,and their rolling arsenal "The Black Beauty". Are Here to protect the rights and lives of decent citizens (and decent posters)

Contact the I.R.S if you are misclassified as an independent contractor. They will straighten that out pretty quickly. That way if you do have to file for Unemployment the funds will be there, if you meet the eligibility requirements. It is difficult to collect unemployment if you quite, being...

Wrong thread

Most state courts,(And all Federal Courts for F.L.S.A violations) award double damages for unpaid wages in court. The administrative agency do not.

No the employer can not bar dating. The D.C. Circuit has reversed the NLRB's finding that a broad no-fraternization policy was not an unfair labor practice. In Guardsmark, LLC v. NLRB(February 2, 2007), the D.C. Circuit reviewed the Board's findings on three separate rules. The court enforced...

The police do not need a warrant when there is probable cause to search the car.

What are you talking about? What paper work? Where is this pleading? You did not put a hypothetical pleading on this thread. Here once again is the original post: Here is the form (Western Wa only) you cant fill in any of the blanks with this post...

You posted case that only made my point: Rizzo, Monroe, Santiago, Smith and City of Newport . Read them then read Poster:local officials discourage redress of grievances and speakers are visiting private groups saying similar things to discourage complaints on good ole boy government"...

You live in a hick town with one policeman you make it sound like you took on the New York city police dept. The cop retired you didn't kill him in court. Once again post a link this alleged trial that you won. The only thing thats proving you went to court for you lost big. My guess is you...

Who you going to sue? The Police where in the post did the police violate anyones civil right. The police are not even mentioned.Poster:local officials discourage redress of grievances and speakers are visiting private groups saying similar things to discourage complaints on good ole boy...

Two frame works not two actions theres thousands of actions I bolden what I said since you seem to not be reading it correctly. I am aware the $75,000 limit that you mistakenly said was $50,000 would not be applicable in 1983 litigation,since I have already read Parratt,and Monroe. You missed...

The poster doesn't have a 1983 case it's that simple. I put down a few reason the case can be dismissed on a 12(b) motion the list is much longer. Not to mention state courts can hear 1983 actions,In fact State courts may be obligated to hear 1983 if they are hearing analogous claims under...

Oh spammerdog lets get back to. YOUR WRONG! (1) The amount is $75,000 your reading an old law comic book. 28 USC §1332(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and...

Yes an electronic signature is binding. You would have a difficult time after being employed for over a year,and claim you were not aware,and did not sign a contract. Nothing in the law requires a witness.

The cases you posted do not attach any special privilege to Pro Se litigants,and nothing in the Federal rules of civil procedure does either. 8(f) is not in dispute the Judge will take the rule into account when he dismiss the complaint. That's if the Pro Se litigant is lucky in this case...

(1) Show me these special Federal Rule of Civil Procedure for a Pro Se's litigants. On the contrary a Pro Se's case is more likely to be dismissed on a motion because the plaintiff is out his element. (2) I left it out because it deals with the pleading, all that means is the pleading...

Do you even read the spam you put up? You cited Rizzo,in your so called Kickass part two,thats what happens when you spam,and cite a case you don't know anything about. If the poster follows your ridiculous advice with the template outlined,the whole thing would be thrown out on a Rule...

Oh its a contract if you signed it. A contract is offer,consideration,and acceptance. Once these elements are met mutual assent has occurred. The offer letter becomes legally binding contract on all parties once mutual assent occurs.

Rizzo was 1976 ,and has not been overturned,it's a good idea to e-mail those lawyers you migh learn something. If those attorneys read your post they will be horrified.