Search results

It's the same as when you plead not guilty. As it was once explained to me, pleading Not Guilty (or, pleading the 5th) is not saying I didn't do it; it's saying, I am standing on my right under the Constitution to have the prosecution prove me guilty.

My reading of the Missouri final paycheck law is that such a deduction is not permissible, and it's strongly discouraged under the FLSA. I would definitely recommend a call to the MO DOL. ETA - that doesn't mean you can't be asked to pay the bill directly.

So, they can't bring their own bags the way people do for grocery stores?

Come on, you boys have been around these boards long enough to figure that out. Filing a lawsuit is much sexier than just submitting a dumb old insurance claim. Anyone can file an insurance claim. Not everyone gets to go to court and have a judge kick the Bad Guy's ass for you, in front of you...

Gra$3, since you clearly do not understand the laws you are reading in the least, please consult with an Idaho attorney who can explain them to you and review any options you might still have.

You might also want to consider hiring with a lawyer who can represent you and your rights. The prosecutor represents the state, not you. Even a consultation (many give free or low cost) might help you better understand how the system works.

Non-compete: I agree not to work for competitors, defined as x, for y period of time. Non-disclosure: I agree not to tell the employer's competitors things about their operation that they don't want made public Not at all the same thing, and while I agree that non-competes are generally...

Is it actually a non-compete you are being asked to sign, or a non-disclosure? They are NOT the same thing, and if the concern is trade secrets, a non-disclosure is much more likely. Non-disclosures are in general much less limiting than non-competes.

And what does any of this have to do with the question at hand?

We had a similar situation a mile and a half from me. The guy was caught yesterday in Florida. The Boston Globe article is behind a paywall (I have a subscription) but this one should be readable. Suspected Marshfield killer arrested in Florida

Then the urgent care's billing office notifies the collection agency that the bill has been paid.

Discrimination based on what school one attended is legal. Nothing that you have posted suggests that the school has violated any laws or protected rights, and nothing you have posted suggests that you have any basis for legal action.

When you called your workers comp carrier and explained your situation, what did they tell you?

A workers comp claim, once accepted, is not contingent on your continued employment and will survive your leaving your current employer.

And that's the last answer you're getting here. This board is not and never was intended to be a substitute for an attorney for someone who doesn't want to pay for one.

This website can only provide general legal information, not specific legal advice. If you are dissatisfied with those terms, by all means feel free to move on and collect your refund at the door.

The suggestion that you discuss it with your attorney, however, is the only reasonable answer there is.

Thanks for the correction, Tax - you are absolutely correct. Mea culpa :)

We're not the ones you have to convince. You want to see a change in the system, contact your Congressman. They can do something about it. We can't.

I have before now had employees (or the dependent/beneficiaries of deceased employees) who are able to show "proof" that the employee had a life insurance policy through the university I work for. However, on many occasions the term of the policy has expired, or the policy was moved from Carrier...