Search results

The odds are somewhere between 0 and 100%. That's as close as anyone can come.

Unless "They" was the IRS, "they" are not necessarily correct.

My physician father died four years ago so Army can correct me if I'm wrong, but as I recall amending chart notes is one thing; deleting them is quite another and can cost the physician his license.

Here's the bottom line, Tina. IRS regulation will determine whether a W-2 or a 1099 is appropriate. It's not a choice. It's not his opt one way or the other. He doesn't get to decide what goes on what form. Neither does the attorney and neither does the judge. It is solely up to the IRS. It...

Agree with Tax that this is solely a matter of your union contract. As a matter of law, they can move you or change your status to and from float every day if they want to.

Then I'd say you shot yourself in the foot and your chances of a successful lawsuit are slim at best. Had you escalated the matter to HR and failed with them, you might have had a better chance. But you didn't even try to resolve the matter internally - that's generally a deal-breaker when it...

Most people do not have a written contract with their employer unless they are in a union or are a high level executive.

At what time did you go to upper management or HR and formally request a religious accommodation of being allowed to continue wearing your hat? Not just, they were aware of your religion, but a formal request?

Somehow I have my doubts that a sign in the break room constitutes a binding and enforceable contract.

In employment law, seniority is a non-issue. There are no laws anywhere in the US that requires an employer to follow any type of seniority in the absence of a contract or CBA that requires it. This is going to be strictly a matter of the union contract and will need to be handled through the union.

And this thread is from January of 2020.

Two possibilities: 1.) Dentist number 1 withheld information and did not do needed work for whatever reason 2.) Dentist number 2 is recommending unneeded work. I agree with welkin (and that's not something that happens every day, or even every month). Get a second opinion.

THIS is a pretty small sampling on which to be basing this: there are parents on the left that teach their children responsibility and common sense but if they are on the left they don't support it on a macro level. And I don't believe for one moment that you didn't know what I was referring to.

But you're not damning the "parents on the left" only in Arkansas with your statements above. You're painting all "parents on the left" in all fifty states with the same brush.

Okay, I'll be more blunt about it. Why do you believe that the lawyer who represents you will not understand the relevant laws and will need you to educate him on the subject?

That's a pretty small sampling to be basing such a sweeping indictment on.

And of course, the lawyer representing you won't have any knowledge of the statutes or caselaw and will need you to interpret them all for him. :rolleyes:

And you can speak definitively of all parents on "the left". Each and every one of them. Who gave you that authority?

And those that do teach their children about responsibility and common sense see their work countered by leftist teachers. Umm, at least by inference, yes you did.

So your answer is not to modify it, but to remove it altogether.