Search results

Surely you can wait the three months until your birthday. Once you're 18 you can go anywhere you want and no one can stop you.

A quirk in the way the law of your state is written means that if you were to run away from home at age 17, some law enforcement might be reluctant to return you home as long as you were in a safe place. However, that same quirk in the law means that if your parents showed up and dragged you...

That may be so, but this episode in history had a great deal of impact on my life and the ones I love. So in the interests of not raising my blood pressure or losing several days of sleep, I think that I will not be participating in this thread. Someone let me know when it's safe to return to...

While I plead guilty to the offense of occasionally arguing with the numbwit, your point is not only quite well taken but I wholeheartedly agree.

Has anyone pointed this out to the numbwit down the street who's going on 20 pages of this nonsense?

How about you playing it smart and saying No?

Then it sounds as if you need to be in touch with your doctor about the retro pre-auth. It is SOP for an insurance carrier to exclude experimental drugs or procedures. Usually they are listed in the policy as not being covered and when that is the case, there is no force on earth that can force...

Based on my reading of the information you provided, I agree. You do not qualify for the STD benefits

And did you return to work after 6 days?

When did you submit your STD claim? Were any benefits paid at any time?

What was the date of your injury?

Okay. Now post the description of who IS eligible.

"Separates from the company" means you don't work there any more. It covers all reasons for termination unless one type of separation is EXcluded. It does not have to list all possible ways of separation; unless the policy says, "Separation does not mean..." then it means everything. Most STD...

Let me try to explain the difference between in network and out of network using actual numbers.This is hypothetical and simplified; used for easy arithmetic. In network facilities have signed a contract to charge no more than $1000 for service ABC. Using the terms of the policy you have...

Not when you use an out of network facility. An in-network facility has contracted to charge x amount for y type of service, and the limits you are responsible for are based on that. But an out of network facility has not signed that contract; if they had, they'd be an in-network facility. You...

That was your responsibility, not the doctor's. Looking at the letter, the $250 is your portion only for the use of the facility. It expressly states that you may be responsible for other feels When the insurance doesn't pay for something and you dispute their findings, an appeal is what you...

A wrongful termination has a very specific meaning. Based on what you have posted no, terming you would not be a wrongful term under the law. I do not discount the possibility that additional facts might change the answer, but not on what we have now.

Sure, it's possible. I've had that kind of position myself. But if they are NOT the same person, it is not guaranteed that HR will have them. Payroll will.

One reason is that HR is not the place that pay stubs are generated. Now, if he were to visit Payroll and nicely ask for copies, he might get somewhere.

It appears to be limited to manual laborers, something that was not in the summary I originally referred to.