Search results

The only thing you have posted that is in any way illegal is the discrimination of people over 60. If you really want to cause trouble that's the way to focus. The rest of the stuff is all non-starters if you're thinking lawsuit. If you're willing to stick with internal measures fine, use...

The Federal government has made it abundantly clear that they do not believe issues of paid time off have anything to do with them - it is a matter between the employer and the employees. Laws regarding paid time off are all at the state level. However, of the 50 states, only California cares...

Generally, "the judge messed up" translates to "I don't like the judge's ruling".

Yeah, and I've been seeing a lot of evidence of it at work, too.

So in five years, you never once looked to see what you were paying for, never checked to make sure the charges were correct, never looked to confirm that payments were going through smoothly, never confirmed that the folks you were sharing it with were on track, never even updated the bank...

And you take no responsibility whatsoever for not checking your account in over 5 years?

We've seen that here before. I'm trying to find the previous reference but haven't found it yet. ETA: found it. Can I sign a document with V.C. (Vi Coactus) after my name, instead of before?

The poster appears to be under the impression that if they put VC before their name when they sign, it means that they signed under duress and invalidates their signature.

The patients are allowed to give their medical information to anyone they choose to.

The time to leave the state is BEFORE your son is born. BEFORE the birth the state has no jurisdiction on where you live or where you go. AFTER the birth, it is possible that your husband could get an order prohibiting you from taking the baby out of state, but BEFORE the birth, you can take the...

And as it turns out, another friend gave me an alternate idea so that when Person C gives Person A the fake information, Person B will automatically respond to Person A in the way that Person C wants her to. So the email headers will all be correct; only the information contained in the email...

jdaries, you and I talked rather extensively on another forum about another topic earlier in the year, and I think you believed what I told you. Is that right? Because if you trust me, I'll take another shot at helping you with this.

That's not necessarily one hundred percent true. Every state has a limited amount that a person is allowed to earn without it affecting their benefits,and then there starts being an offset. For example, my state will allow you to earn up to 1/3 of your unemployment benefit with no affect, and...

In every state that I know of, you report partial pay to UI when you earn it and not when you receive it.

Thank you, Welkin. That may be very helpful as I go deeper into the story.

Now that just might do it. Thank you, Tax, you rock too! But then, you knew that. :D

Well, that wasn't news I wanted to hear, Tax, but it's news I needed to hear. It only has to appear superficially as if it came from Person B's account; it doesn't really matter how easy it would be to break the facade and see that it's a fake. But it does have to at least at a quick glance...

The fake information kind of walks the line between Zig's two scenarios. It's closer to the second in that both of them really should have known that it was fake. But it's close enough to the first so that it's believable, and a subsequent event that they both misinterpret seems to verify it...

I am sort of vaguely aware of the fact that email headers exist and what is included in them. I may need to know more about them as I progress; I'm not sure yet. At this stage I did need to know whether the type of fake email I needed to have sent existed as the story line requires that Person A...

Thank you. That's what I needed to know.