Search results

You'll need to ask a forum or attorney in India, sorry.

I think should read the information here: http://www.workplacefairness.org/whistleblower-retaliation-claim-WA Don't make any snap decisions - you might want to consult with a local attorney before you do anything.

You need a UK forum, sorry. This one deals with US law.

Alabama DHR does not have any control over Mom without there being a pain-in-the-backside process to complete first. What they've done is simply given her a choice. Get Georgia involved, or bring the child back to Dad. Mom needs an attorney DESPERATELY - as in first thing Monday...

And in which court has this suit been filed? I'm not talking about location - I'm talking about small claims, superior, whatever.

This link provides some answers: http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=184434 I do wish you luck - but your son has really got to step up here. If he can prove that Mom is interfering with visitation, she won't be allowed to continue forever. He really needs to stand firm -...

This is absolutely not alienation of affection. That describes a situation where the spouse looks to sue a third party for breaking up a marriage. It has nothing at all to do with child custody. Are you confusing it with something else?

First things first. The 1st Amendment does not protect you from being sued because of something you've said, nor does it provide protection from criminal suits. More importantly though, is the cost. A defamation suit is inherently expensive to litigate, and unfortunately what we...

Sue for what exactly? The employer does not need to prove the allegation.

Statements made before the court carry an absolute protection from being used to support a defamation action. In other words, you have nothing. You're welcome.

I'd like to know why there was a case-worker involved to begin with.

The court can investigate any abuse allegation.

Attorney. This situation requires an attorney.

Naturally, adoption will remove any and all rights of the ex-parent. But you said that the parent who doesn't have custody had no rights to complain, which isn't the same thing. I was simply clarifying.

Grandpa having custody absolutely does not equate to the OP having no right to object to Grandpa's parenting. It's the same thing as any shared parenting - neither party has 100% control.

The child cannot confer any legal rights until the child is 21. Dad may have other options available, but it has absolutely NOTHING to do with Obama or Texas.

Er... okay then ... carry on....

I believe there might be some inaccuracies in OP's initial post.

If you've only seen your son 7 times over 4 years, your father actually has a better-than-decent shot at the adoption. For how long was child support not being paid? Where is the other parent?

Does he WANT to see the child? Why didn't the state move to TPR if he's been deemed a danger to the child?