Search results

It certainly is no surprise that Biden pardoned his son regardless of how many times he said he would not. And how the media praised him for upholding the rule-of-law and that no one was above the law. The media now has egg on their faces. When Hunter plead guilty to the charges, he knew that...

The irony was wasted on you.

I guess you missed the irony of my post. It's a perversion of the age old saying, Do as I say, not as I do. "Do as I say, not as I do" means that you should follow the instructions or advice given, even if the person giving it doesn't always act in accordance with those same standards...

Trump is not trying to raise revenue with tariffs. The threat of tariffs is a subterfuge to bargain with, and it has already worked with Mexico and Canada as reported in the new. Trump said the import duties on Mexico and Canada would only be removed once illegal immigration and drug...

I think you are projecting how you would be a president. Not every person elected President of the US has an ego that big. Some in our history truly want to do what is right for the Country. Sigmund Freud would love you.

Yes, and it does not address public park land. It is about selling off city owned buildings and the land they sit on. Something completely different.

What charter a municipality adopts as their form of governance is not controlled by state statute. There are many forms of governance that a city or a municipality may adopt. If you read the different forms of governance that a municipality or city has as an option, and when they adopted it...

It's too late now because all the hearings are over, and the congestion tolls are going into effect. You could have had your voice heard.

Nope! City owned park land cannot be sold or leased without the passage of an ordinance. That would necessitate the introduction of the proposed ordinance, public hearings, and ultimate passage. There would surely be public records of such a passage. On the other hand, a change in third...

What you do in a case like is to file suit against the LLC (assuming the contract is in that name) and in the name of the owner of the LLC. You do not worry about piercing the corporate at this point. It will be up to the owner to file a motion to dismiss the suit against himself. That is...

That is not what the cop testified to. It was he who charged OP on behalf of himself not someone in oncoming traffic. The use of head lights statute is one of the least used citations issued in NJ because it is very hard for an officer to witness the violation effecting oncoming traffic.

Well, as a lawyer, you should be concerned about what cases that were brought against Trump and how the laws were used in novel interpretations (never before in US jurisprudence). But since you admitted in a previous post that you only get your information from the media and not the court...

All you have to do is click on the link to the judge's order (in the article posted) and you can read it for yourself.

Ok, you were a saint. :) Very commendable. But since I don't know how old you are, I can't place you at a time in our country's history to know what the cultural norms were when you were in college. Being a geek in say the late 1960's to 1970's must have been difficult. That was the Age of...

The statute doesn't address using your high beams while following a vehicle. It only addresses oncoming vehicles. No offense was committed. You should read the statute and understand what it says before commenting.

It's the cancel culture. Perfectly OK when the left does it to someone but not when the right does it. It's vicious and wrong and should stop on both sides. I won't hold my breath.

You should remember that our culture and society norms were very different 10-20 years ago. A male co-worker slapping a female co-worker on the but while passing in the hall was not ever considered sexual harassment. It may have been considered a compliment. I would be willing to bet that if...

The governor of FL can fill the vacancy by putting Gaetz back in the Senate. Any other speculation is a red herring. It's not up to Congress.

The tailgating tick is the serious one. The improper use of high beams is a BS ticket and doesn't apply to what the cop accused you of. It should have been dismissed. All the cop had to do is flip his rearview mirror to night vision. You should have done your due diligence before your...