Search results

You are his father. You already have custody. So long as you do not do anything to deliberately restrict mom's access to him, do what you want.

If you push the matter I suspect they will have difficulty withholding the payment when you were not allowed access. This is not a good way to start off a new tenancy. Perhaps you can ask them about offsetting the next month's rent with the difference.

I woukd make a call to rhe school district/superintendent. When the right person asks why the transcrpts have not been sent, things will get done in a hurry..

I did not mean to imply that mutual combat is legal, just that it is unlikely to be prosecuted. As described here, this will be a very weak case to pursue against either party as they were equal aggressors.

Odds are the DA will view this as mutual combat and nothing will happen. You can still seek a restraining order that may require him to move out.

You would need information that tends to prove that the employee was treated unfairly because of the employees race. Scenario you have provided here does not clearly indicate that race was the reason for the behavior.

When dealing with parents and unruly kids I have often encouraged them to beat the little brats if they feel it is appropriate. They just have to recognize the limits. So many are afraid they will get in trouble, and indoctrination from schools seems to make kids think nobody can touch them...

That isn't entirely accurate. What is reasonable is very subjective. Regardless of age, spanking with an open hand is widely accepted as allowable discipline. It isn't for everyone, but the spanking here really is not an issue. Same is true for a mother who slaps her disrespectful teenage son...

It may be relevant to proving the specific elements of the crimes. If you know the specific statutes that have been charged you can read them and have a better understanding of evidence presented. That language sounds like it may have something to do with an enhancement.

It probably isn't broken. Is is designed to come apart for exactly that reason. You both share fault. The attendant clearly should have removed the fuel nozzle freon the car, however you are responsible for the operation of your vehicle and should have made sure it was safe to proceed.

It isn't that cut and dry. Bruising may just as easily have been a result of the girl's own actions. It doesn't automatically mean abuse. What is described here is an incorrigible youth, not child abuse.

I strongly suspect that this action plan that you described is completely voluntary. I am curious what you have been told that makes you think that you are obligated to abide by it. If the incidents that you described are true, there is nothing about it, regardless of the bruises, that amounts...

Nope. They are not your kids. You have no rights whatsoever regarding them.

No.

I agree that the value of these incomplete restoration is very important. It is unlikely you would recover more than the value immediately prior to the damage. Without a doubt, you will value the vehicle higher than a disinterested 3rd party. The value is quite subjective. It would make more...

If the 1.5 feet are that important, the first thing to do is pay for your own survey. Until you have that, despite the markers, you are guessing where the boundaries are.

You lack standing to seek any change. If someone else seeks the modification you might get access to the kids, but until that happens all parties should abide by the order.

I don't see why it is in the interest of the US to be involved at all beyond diplomatic efforts.

Here is a doozy destined for CourtTV (the former deputy). Ex-teacher who fed students semen-laced cupcakes sentenced to 41 years

My first question is what specific action is being described as a chokehold. It's a term used very loosely in most cases. Second, I question what circumstances existed that justified it, other than mere presence in the home. I can understand the arrest. It's still a homicide, even if later...