Search results

I agree individuals took part in criminal acts and should be prosecuted.

I agree that Charter should be held responsible. But $7.37 Billion? How is that possibly justified?

But this isn't really his initial application. He has been turned down before.

And you are doing this without a lawyer?

I had DirectTV do the same thing many years ago. I called and said, "Nope, I sent it back." They said, "Sorry for the mix up I'll remove that charge." I thought about it several months later when my neighbor was having DTV installed. I called them to inquire about new service and they looked...

@zddoodah mentioned this but I don't want it to get lost. You are 100% wrong about this. The attorney is YOUR attorney. If this case ever comes to the point where the interests of you and your insurance company aren't the same the attorney's duty is to you, not the insurance company.

You should definitely stick with the WC case. In actuality, there really isn't any other legal option for your employer. I will be very surprised if you won't also have to take further tests.

You both realize that the court's expansion of the word "sex" in to meaning "sexual preference" and "non-birth sexual identity" is the only reason that LGBTQ+ people have any protection under the various civil rights laws. This is because once again Congress has not done its' job an relied on...

Bill Burr has a funny and insightful bit on that in his new comedy special on Netflix.

The car owner could be charged immediately under Section 165.40 - Criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, N.Y. Penal Law § 165.40 | Casetext Search + Citator

I always thought Russia and its client states were Second World.

This is a Workers' Comp issue.

Had it been a boat having the life vest sitting next to him and not on him would have protected him from the crime he was charged with. In fact, he would have been 100% legal in VA.

Copyright Protection in Derivative Works The copyright in a derivative work covers only the additions, changes, or other new material appearing for the first time in the work. Protection does not extend to any preexisting material, that is, previously published or previously regis- tered works...

Yes

I still would contact the court. First, to make sure that they didn't show up and get a default judgment, and second, to file for a motion to dismiss based on them not showing up.

That just doesn't sound right to me. I find it hard to imagine a situation where it is one side's responsibility to make sure the other side is there. You need to contact the court and make sure that a default judgment hasn't been granted to the plaintiff. There is likely a limited amount of...

So you are really no better than Redemptionman?

I don't know that this is 100% true. While the estate certainly owes for the funeral the OP didn't wire the estate the money.

Batman is Trademark owned by DC Comics.