Search results

As far as what Dads been told and read is that she can have a voice on her preferance as early as 12. Which the judge can consider if he chooses. Also once shes old enough to let the courts and others know what she's seen mom do and her voice is heard it will be end of story for mom. At what age...

so if someone was paying support and turned out not to be the parent they would still have to pay even if the childs not theirs until the true parent would step forth? man the systems skrewed up!!

All I really have to say is good luck Trace!!!! I've seen similar situations with the parent withholding the child from the other and it's not easy!

I think it's pretty clear after her last comment that she doesn't care what you think and thats not why she's here. Plus it sounds like she already knows the deal so I don't think it can really be much more disappointing than it already is for her.

needachange i know its hard when all you want is some advice and all you're getting is judged and harrassed over a question you'd really just like a simple answer to. Not to mention you get bashed with a bunch of questions about your question. Which I really feel most of the time is uneeded. As...

i completely agree. I think that's how easy it should have been. I think things shouldn't always have to result in courts and lawyers.

It's become VERY apparent to me that Dads MUCH better off getting paidfor legal advice from a pro. than dealing with the headache he'd get here. What will probably happen in the next few years is mom will continue messing up and finally get caught putting her child in danger and Dad will easily...

Thank you very much mightymoose!! Very helpful!! Thats what I was thinking but wasn't sure. LOL she took his car too!! Ex's arent they wonderful! Army judge, I'm sure no matter what would have happened if he had "attempted" to take the dog back the law would have been in his favor being as...

This is not just Dad "feeling" he is a better parent. He "IS". He has more time for the child, has more money for the child, has a better home and home environment, better morals, better lifestyle, and can prove these things. He can give the child a better life and has the proof. Would the...

It makes me sad to see how someone can jump to conclusion on here. Ok first, the ex I was referring to i guess I should have elaborated was an ex girlfriend not ex wife. So sorry if that was important. So the dog was his dog, period end of story. I thought my question was pretty simple but I'll...

no im asking if he could have taken it back right away when it was taken from him. Not now. He may not even take it back now for that reason. It been with that woman for this long it probably isn't whats best. It's kind of the point that it's his dog and he really should have every right to take...

mom may not be in there minds unfit. Or he just does not have enough proof. There's no major changes in circumstances. The only thing is that the father wants to have the child fulltime because he feels he will provide a better life for the child. so that isn't enough to change custody. even if...

also I'm sure someone is going to ask why would he wait this long to get the dog back. The dog was very large and for that amount of time he wasn't settled in a place to keep the dog, he didn't feel it was in its best interest considering his situation.

My husband had bought a dog while he was with his ex with his own money. This was about 3 years ago. The dog was registered in his name and all vet records and payments for the dog in his name. When she left him she took the dog. does the fact that the dog was registerd and everything was under...

nope. not the one here paying any support to anyone. Infact support has never been an issue for dad from what i know. it's really very simple. The dad feels he is better fit and can provide a better life for the child and is looking for ways to prove it. Thats all. Yes, maybe mom isn't lighting...

so...if dad was to get children and youth involved again is there any way to ensure that she would be given the test timely without a 30day heads up to clean up? If not is there any way that the courts can have her tested on the spot? if so what would they consider as enough proof to do so? Also...

My main question still is how does dad get mom drug tested? Also, children and youth had said they were going to place the child in emergency custody to the father if she tested for drugs. should dad hire a PI to get proof of what is happening when the child's with mom?

like I had said earlier she was given over 30 days (from the time she was told she needed to take the test) to take her test.....which would mean that nearly ANY single drug would have been given enough time to clear her system from being detected. I know the pictures are worthless, I didn't say...

Here's the question. how does dad obtain proof? dad doesn't know what all drugs because she was never tested when they were in her system. she was given enough time by children and youth to clean up. From what he was told by her marijuana and cocaine. There have been no DUI's with the child...

dads goal is to have proof of the mother using drugs and alcohol. Witnesses being mutual friends have seen the mother doing drugs and drinking with child in home and in the car. The child is 5. the father is concerned for safety of his child but does not know how to go about proving his case.