NotTheFish
New Member
Within the last year there was a burglary next door to where Fish lived at the time. A detective has been trying to get a hold of Fish since early January and recently succeeded and asked Fish to come in today in about 2 and 1/2 hours for questioning related to said incident. Fish does not want to talk to them AT ALL for a multitude of reasons. The most important being that Fish thinks he/she is a suspect. Fish lived not 50 feet from the house and has a record (for marijuana but still) so Fish thinks that set off their suspicion. Secondly and nearly just as important, Fish will be of no aid in this investigation and Fish just really doesn't want to talk to them at all. They have never helped fish, actually the opposite. Assuming(!) that Fish commit a crime not entirely unrelated to said burglary; Fish's question(s) is/are.
1. Can Fish just call him and say, "I am invoking my right to remain silent under the reasoning that I will be of no aid in your investigation and will only be wasting time and resources. Any future questions must be asked through a lawyer and/or not answered." (or something shorter)
2. Can they continue to bug Fish and call Fish after he does number 1. Fish has no lawyer so they would/should not be able to ask me anymore questions unless the detain or arrest me, correct?
3. When pertaining to being questioned, is Fish's right to a lawyer being present at no cost to Fish still viable. Fish would feel more comfortable if someone was there that Fish KNEW was on his/her side instead of Fish being the only one Fish KNOWS is on Fish's side. A lawyer would keep Fish from becoming one of those "false confession" people. (Number 3 is assuming that 1 and 2 are not viable or advisable for Fish to do.)
I don't want to see the inside of a police station ever again.
1. Can Fish just call him and say, "I am invoking my right to remain silent under the reasoning that I will be of no aid in your investigation and will only be wasting time and resources. Any future questions must be asked through a lawyer and/or not answered." (or something shorter)
2. Can they continue to bug Fish and call Fish after he does number 1. Fish has no lawyer so they would/should not be able to ask me anymore questions unless the detain or arrest me, correct?
3. When pertaining to being questioned, is Fish's right to a lawyer being present at no cost to Fish still viable. Fish would feel more comfortable if someone was there that Fish KNEW was on his/her side instead of Fish being the only one Fish KNOWS is on Fish's side. A lawyer would keep Fish from becoming one of those "false confession" people. (Number 3 is assuming that 1 and 2 are not viable or advisable for Fish to do.)
I don't want to see the inside of a police station ever again.