- Jurisdiction
- California
Child's pediatrician's routine vision screening procedure consistently missed a major vision problem for several years. Every year (for at least 4 consecutive years), the doctor said her vision was 20/20 in each eye. In late 2019 my child complained of blurry vision in one eye. The doctor performed the same visual test and said there was still no problem. Pediatric eye specialist diagnosed child with severe amblyopia. Specialist confirmed this would have started at birth and my child did not report poor vision until older because she didn't have a basis for comparison of normal vision. Also confirmed this should have been easy to catch on a routine pediatric vision screening that is part of the normal annual check-up. The pediatrician's procedure was insufficient - since hearing about our case, they have changed their procedure to be more rigorous. The earlier treatment begins for this condition, the better the outcome. My child essentially missed the window for early treatment due to pediatrician completely missing the problem for several years.
Do I have a viable legal case against the pediatrician? Or any other avenue of recourse? My child now has to see an eye doctor on a regular basis for lifetime, wear glasses, possible restrictions on future driving or careers, possible surgery. All of these financial and time consequences could have been mitigated by early intervention.
Do I have a viable legal case against the pediatrician? Or any other avenue of recourse? My child now has to see an eye doctor on a regular basis for lifetime, wear glasses, possible restrictions on future driving or careers, possible surgery. All of these financial and time consequences could have been mitigated by early intervention.
Last edited: