Have a simple question about the civil demand's reasoning. Typically department store loss prevention charge caught shoplifters to "recover costs." However if the stolen merchandise was all returned, and they can STILL resell it what's the big issue? Furthermore on the civil demand most department stores tack on the reason "that they had to hire loss prevention etc" as part of the civil demand. Regardless of the specific customer who shoplifted, they would have had a loss prevention department to begin with. Working 24/7. How is that reasoning fair, or legal to pass their "security" costs down to a shoplifter? Especially when they are charging sometimes 2x 3x the amount of the actual merchandise that was taken?
Last edited: