I wonder if it is really reasonable for someone to be ordered to have to take regular hair drug testing for admiting in a divorce with child custody that they smoked marijuanna but not on a regular basis, only on occasion (maybe 5 times a year?) and never in front of their children or even while they were at home or if they were they were not awake. The person ordered to be drug tested has never been arrested for possesion, never done any other kinds of drugs or been in any sort of trouble with the law what so ever. The opposing spouse has had a history of arrests (non-felony) admitted to being an alcoholic drinking everyday and also has a history of doing very hard drugs, but yet, they are not ordered to take any drug test! Why would the judge order something like that for someone that has never been in trouble and someone that did not lie on the stand in court? How can one oppose this and get an order to stop the drug testing as it is expensive and makes it difficult to have to pay for this out of pocket with small children in the home that needs to be taken care of and has to do without certian things when it's time for the drug test? Paying for the testing is a hardship since it's $150 each test! Can one get away with paying for a cheaper test without permission from the court? Urine test is $60. Honestly, there is no history of any other drugs and this person has never been in trouble with the law. Also, incase you are wondering, anytime this person did smoke marijuanna, it was a gift from a friend and was never paid for, so no money was taken away from the children.
Last edited: