familyiseverything
New Member
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
Hello to all and thank you for your time in reading and answering my question.
Our ex employee, who happens to be my son, was in charge of buying and maintaining our business domain names, and building or having built our business web sites. All of these purchases were paid for on our corporate (C Corp) credit cards. Sadly we had to terminate our son from the business. He now refuses to transfer our domain names to us and is claiming them as his own. They are registered in his name, but were paid for (verifiable with credit card statements) by the corporation. These domain names and websites were used in the daily operations of our retail business. Our credit card paid for all of the fees associated with maintaining and running these domains and websites. The income generated from the websites have always been deposited into our business bank account directly from the web host shopping cart. These funds were used for the day to day operations including payroll, inventory and taxes.
A month after my son was terminated, he turned off our website and forwarded a new bank account number to the webhost, funneling one month's income to his own bank account. Further, my son built a competing business website, and is now pointing our domain names to his new website effectively stealing many of our lifelong customers.
I know that domain name law is a grey area, but my question is this: If my company has verifiable proof that it paid for the domain names, or really any tangible asset, shouldn't these items be considered corporate holdings and remanded back to the corporation?
We filed for an emergency injunction. They have answered that the domain names are registered in his name, therefor they belong to him.
We are in the middle of our legal argument back and I am looking for caselaw that would pertain to if an employee could keep assets purchased by his employer. If someone could point me to some sort of caselaw that could be cited in our rebuttal, that would be of tremendous help!
Their attorney is citing Crowe v. De Giola, 90 N.J. 126 in his answer. It doesn't seem like it's relevant as it pertains to a separated couple, and the unfulfilled agreement of support from the wealthy partner.
Thank very much for your time, The Family
Our ex employee, who happens to be my son, was in charge of buying and maintaining our business domain names, and building or having built our business web sites. All of these purchases were paid for on our corporate (C Corp) credit cards. Sadly we had to terminate our son from the business. He now refuses to transfer our domain names to us and is claiming them as his own. They are registered in his name, but were paid for (verifiable with credit card statements) by the corporation. These domain names and websites were used in the daily operations of our retail business. Our credit card paid for all of the fees associated with maintaining and running these domains and websites. The income generated from the websites have always been deposited into our business bank account directly from the web host shopping cart. These funds were used for the day to day operations including payroll, inventory and taxes.
A month after my son was terminated, he turned off our website and forwarded a new bank account number to the webhost, funneling one month's income to his own bank account. Further, my son built a competing business website, and is now pointing our domain names to his new website effectively stealing many of our lifelong customers.
I know that domain name law is a grey area, but my question is this: If my company has verifiable proof that it paid for the domain names, or really any tangible asset, shouldn't these items be considered corporate holdings and remanded back to the corporation?
We filed for an emergency injunction. They have answered that the domain names are registered in his name, therefor they belong to him.
We are in the middle of our legal argument back and I am looking for caselaw that would pertain to if an employee could keep assets purchased by his employer. If someone could point me to some sort of caselaw that could be cited in our rebuttal, that would be of tremendous help!
Their attorney is citing Crowe v. De Giola, 90 N.J. 126 in his answer. It doesn't seem like it's relevant as it pertains to a separated couple, and the unfulfilled agreement of support from the wealthy partner.
Thank very much for your time, The Family