Hello and thank you for your help.
My wife worked for a large (50+) company and took a pre approved leave for maternity. she used her vacation time and short term disability insurance (no company pay) while off and planned on returning to work June 8th. On June 4th she was contacted and informed that her department was being downsized (she was let go), and a severance package/forms would be offered. Offered 2 weeks pay. That is fine and understandable/acceptable.
However, through previous coworkers, it has been mentioned that the reason she was let go for not returning phone calls/ emails (doing the activities of her job) while on maternity leave.
We have the times and dates of the phone calls and possibly a voice mail or two (asking her work questions/asking her to fix work problems). A lawyer could speak to the worker who heard the conversations regarding her "lay off". This is slightly more than a rumor, but slightly less than a smoking gun. Would this be worth pursuing? Can an employee be enough to implicate the company? Or should we just accept this and move on?
My wife worked for a large (50+) company and took a pre approved leave for maternity. she used her vacation time and short term disability insurance (no company pay) while off and planned on returning to work June 8th. On June 4th she was contacted and informed that her department was being downsized (she was let go), and a severance package/forms would be offered. Offered 2 weeks pay. That is fine and understandable/acceptable.
However, through previous coworkers, it has been mentioned that the reason she was let go for not returning phone calls/ emails (doing the activities of her job) while on maternity leave.
We have the times and dates of the phone calls and possibly a voice mail or two (asking her work questions/asking her to fix work problems). A lawyer could speak to the worker who heard the conversations regarding her "lay off". This is slightly more than a rumor, but slightly less than a smoking gun. Would this be worth pursuing? Can an employee be enough to implicate the company? Or should we just accept this and move on?