Forecaster who called the 2020 result makes shock 'blowout' claim in Trump-Harris race

army judge

Super Moderator
A data scientist who predicted the outcome of the 2020 presidential election has anticipated a landslide for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, in a blow to former president Donald Trump's hopes to reclaim the White House.

Northwestern University data scientist Thomas Miller said that Harris will knock Trump in a landslide election, telling Fortune Magazine: 'It's gone from a drastic landslide in Trump's direction to a drastic landslide for Harris'.

Miller first gained attention after he accurately predicted the 2020 presidential election by unconventionally using betting markets rather than traditional polls to forecast the outcome.

He achieved this by developing a model, which is based on 16 presidential elections, that converted betting prices into the popular vote and Electoral College projections.

This model shows a narrow correlation between betting odds and the anticipated popular vote.

As of September, Miller's model showed Harris would have 55% of the popular vote, which would translate into a significant lead in the Electoral College.

Miller's analysis also showed that support for Harris has expanded in recent months, despite the fact that Trump had taken the lead in June.

But there has been a huge swing from when president Joe Biden was still nominee, as the odds have shifted drastically.

His prediction came as the latest poll by Quinnipiac Universisty suggested that Harris is pulling ahead in key swing states.

The survey found that Harris has a six-point lead in Pennsylvania - 51 per cent to 45 percent - a state that has been billed as a potential decider in the up-coming election in November.

In Michigan, meanwhile, the poll suggests Trump is behind Harris by 5 points, with the vice president winning the support of 50 percent of voters, while the Republican presidential candidate is backed by 45 percent.

As for Wisconsin, Harris is narrowly ahead of Trump with 48% of voter support compared to 47%, the poll said.

Neither candidate is likely to win the presidential election while losing to all three swing states, making the latest poll grim reading for Trump and his campaign.

Trump won all three so-called 'blue wall' states over Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016, delivering him an Electoral College victory. Meanwhile in 2020, President Joe Biden won them back to the Democratic column.

By narrow margins, voters in the three swing states says Trump is the better leader on the economy and immigration but Harris is the far-and-away leader on the issue of abortion.

In Pennsylvania, 57 percent say Harris would do a better job handling the issue of abortion, compared to 38 percent who said Trump.

In Michigan it's 53 percent for Harris and 42 percent for Trump and in Wisconsin 53 percent also said Harris, while 40 percent said Trump.

The states are often referred to as the 'blue wall' because of their significance to democrat candidates.

This comes after Harris received an endorsement last week from megastar Taylor Swift, who announced her support for the vice president just moments after the presidential debate.

The singer's bombshell announcement could have huge ramifications on the momentum with less than eight weeks until election day.


 
He is probably right, I am not sure I would feel about it. I like Harris better than Biden but her policies are way more radical than Biden.
 
I have doubts about any landslide victory for either candidate. If Harris wins in a landslide, it may very well be abortion that helps propel that result. For decades very conservative Republicans could run on a platform that included a no compromise approach to abortion — staking out the position that all abortion should be criminalized, though some would allow an exception to save the life of the mother — safe in the knowledge that with the Roe v. Wade decision in place those who opposed very strict restrictions on abortion wouldn't be motivated to vote based primarily on the abortion stance of the candidate. As long as the candidate couldn't make their promises come true it was an easy, safe throw away promise a candidate could make to the most conservative voters in their state/district. Those representatives and senators got a real jolt when the Roe decision fell and they discovered that a very strict abortion stance was favored only by a minority of voters. Even in some solid red parts of the country the issue may be enough to flip votes blue. That old adage of "beware of what you wish for because you just might get it" seems to apply here.
 
Back
Top