Landlord charging fee's which were never agreed upon

Status
Not open for further replies.

kmdesprez

New Member
My jurisdiction is: California

On March 5, 2009, the last day to submit rent, I was not able to pay due to financial struggles. On Friday March 6, I received a notice to pay rent or quit within the next three business days, which would give me to the 11th. On the Thursday the 12th I spoke with a representative of the complex, explaining that I had some set backs this month; however, I will have the money in a few more days. The representative agreed; however, an additional $50.00 will be applied as a late fee an additional. I happily agreed to her terms. At approximately 7:30 pm on March 16, 2009, I submitted the agreed monthly rent of $1598.00, plus the late fee of $50.00, totaling $1648.00. At approximately 8:00 pm, I was served a Summons of Unlawful Detainer-Eviction papers. The apartment complex then returned the check of $1648.00 on March 17, 2009. After speaking with the manager of the apartment complex on March 17, they accepted the rent of $1648.00; however, they also demands that there is a $750.00 "attorney fees" that needs to be paid. I then responded to the courts with an "Answer" to the summons of unlawful detainer-eviction papers within the allowed amount of time. I stated "plaintiff accepted rent from defendant to cover a period of time after the date the notice to quit expired". I also turned in a request for all court fees to be waived. Because the complex accepted the rent check for the month of March, the eviction process is stopped. However, the manager of the complex told me that if I do not pay the $750 attorney fees, I would be evicted. I don't understand how they would have the right to do that. It is not in the contract that I would be responsible for paying any attorney fees. The only additional fee to a late payment is the $50 (which I paid). Am I in the wrong? What should I do now?
 
California has some very strong tenant protection laws.

The process of eviction was stopped because management accepted your rent check plus the late fees. If they had not (and the eviction process continued) they could have requested the court that their fees for eviction be tacked on to what you owe (although it's a bit unusual for a court to grant attorney fees).

At this point, the matter is moot. The case is closed. Management gets to eat the attorney fees.

Gail
 
how do i know i am in the right?

They have still sent me a bill for the attorney fees, and said if I don't pay, they will evict me. How do I know I am in the right? Is there a web sight that states all the laws I can show my landlord? I don't want to go through this process again. Thank you for all your help. I tried to contact an attorney to get their feedback; however, I haven't received any response.

Kaylin
 
Let me put it this way...

The $750 bill involves the Unlawful Detainer action regarding the late rent. Because the complex accepted your rent money, the eviction was stopped. In other words, you "won" the case (or at least, it didn't progress any further). Now they want you to pay their attorney fees for a case that didn't happen? Nope. They are trying to bluff you into paying fees that were never agreed to.

It would probably have been smarter of them not to accept your rent check and proceed with the court hearing. They didn't take this route though.

Personally, I'd simply sit back and not respond to them at all. If they do attempt another Unlawful Detainer action and you do go to court, management would have a difficult time getting a judge to buy the idea that YOU owe them the attorney fees when they're the ones who accepted your rent check/late fees and thus ended the case.

Gail
 
I disagree with "Gail in Georgia" a little bit. I agree that they most likely would not prevail in an eviction hearing because the attorney cost were not stipulated in the lease but I do believe that they could get a judgement in their favor for the cost in small claims court. It could be argued that the attorney fees were only necessary because you failed to pay rent as required in the lease and thus they should be compensated for their loss. I don't think it is uncommon for the court to grant attorney fees when reasonable... Though, I'd say these are unreasonable.

As a landlord, I would have applied your payment to attorney fees, late fees, then to the rent and sent you a bill for unpaid rent ;) It may not make a difference but I do know its much easier standing in eviction court claiming you haven't paid the rent than any other lease violation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top