- Jurisdiction
- California
I am renewing my 6mo. lease, and was bringing in a new roommate to the house. The roommate and I signed the lease, but after it was signed my roommate didn't pass the background check given by my landlords and has dropped out. This person never physically moved in. The landlords have stated (I have text messages for proof) that they will just scratch out the other person's name on the contract, and make it a month-to-month. Then start the 6month contract I had signed, next month but with another roommate added to it.
It was hard finding a roommate, so with this opportunity I have decided to move out and give my 30 days, paying for this month-to-month and then leaving. Obviously the landlords are not going to like this, and I'm sure will try to say that because I had signed that 6 month lease, I will be bound to stay there.
My questions:
Would the original 6 month lease still be valid if one of the parties (that first potential roommate that signed) is out of the deal?
Can I use the physical text messages the landlords sent me that stated they will make this upcoming month a month-to-month as leverage that the 6mo lease(which specifically states the months the lease is for) is not valid?
It was hard finding a roommate, so with this opportunity I have decided to move out and give my 30 days, paying for this month-to-month and then leaving. Obviously the landlords are not going to like this, and I'm sure will try to say that because I had signed that 6 month lease, I will be bound to stay there.
My questions:
Would the original 6 month lease still be valid if one of the parties (that first potential roommate that signed) is out of the deal?
Can I use the physical text messages the landlords sent me that stated they will make this upcoming month a month-to-month as leverage that the 6mo lease(which specifically states the months the lease is for) is not valid?