S. F. Ukridge
New Member
- Jurisdiction
- California
Brief question first, details after:
Is it normal for a beneficiary of an estate to be directed to contact the executor only through the latter's legal representation? In this case, the trustee is my sole co-beneficiary (and brother)
Detailed version:
Our parents had a revocable family trust drawn up many years ago, and recently our dad became the latter of our two parents to pass away. The terms of the trust and the will included therein are standard and direct that the assets should be divided into two equal shares, one for me and one for my sole other sibling. My brother, who is now trustee, and I are the only direct beneficiaries of the will.
Although we live in different cities and rarely see each other, my brother and I are on friendly terms. Since our dad's passing we have been in contact several times regarding the dispersal of the estate, and based on such contacts I have no reason to believe that anything is amiss. However, I recently received a letter from a law firm hired by my brother, as trustee, to administer the distribution, advising me of this event and also that the trust was now irrevocable. Additionally, there was a boldface disclaimer informing me that I had 120 days to contest the will. All the aforementioned notices are required by the California Probate Code, so naturally there's nothing to concern me there.
What does trouble me is another one-page notification that was included in the package. This states that, according to the terms of the trust, my brother has become the trustee, and that if I need to contact him I should do so through his legal counsel, which is a different firm from the above. Say what?!! We texted each other three days ago. A few days before that we talked. Now I'm hesitant even to contact him because of the standard disinheritance clause included in the will, advising that any effort to contest the will, including the choice of executor/trustee, could be grounds for disinheritance. Although I do realize that disinheritance clauses aren't always enforceable, it's not something on which I care to experiment. So now I'm hesitant even to contact my brother to ask about this.
Do I have anything to worry about here?
Is it normal for a beneficiary of an estate to be directed to contact the executor only through the latter's legal representation? In this case, the trustee is my sole co-beneficiary (and brother)
Detailed version:
Our parents had a revocable family trust drawn up many years ago, and recently our dad became the latter of our two parents to pass away. The terms of the trust and the will included therein are standard and direct that the assets should be divided into two equal shares, one for me and one for my sole other sibling. My brother, who is now trustee, and I are the only direct beneficiaries of the will.
Although we live in different cities and rarely see each other, my brother and I are on friendly terms. Since our dad's passing we have been in contact several times regarding the dispersal of the estate, and based on such contacts I have no reason to believe that anything is amiss. However, I recently received a letter from a law firm hired by my brother, as trustee, to administer the distribution, advising me of this event and also that the trust was now irrevocable. Additionally, there was a boldface disclaimer informing me that I had 120 days to contest the will. All the aforementioned notices are required by the California Probate Code, so naturally there's nothing to concern me there.
What does trouble me is another one-page notification that was included in the package. This states that, according to the terms of the trust, my brother has become the trustee, and that if I need to contact him I should do so through his legal counsel, which is a different firm from the above. Say what?!! We texted each other three days ago. A few days before that we talked. Now I'm hesitant even to contact him because of the standard disinheritance clause included in the will, advising that any effort to contest the will, including the choice of executor/trustee, could be grounds for disinheritance. Although I do realize that disinheritance clauses aren't always enforceable, it's not something on which I care to experiment. So now I'm hesitant even to contact my brother to ask about this.
Do I have anything to worry about here?