Can companies use layoffs to get rid of people they don't want?
A typical layoff goes something like this:
- You will likely be called into a meeting with a senior member of the team and human resources
- In the span of 30 minutes, they will explain the conditions of your termination
- Typically, you will be given a packet of documents, including a copy of your employment contract and benefits information
- Rarely, you will be offered some severance pay
- In California, you will be provided with a last paycheck during the meeting
- You will be asked to sign some paperwork and to give feedback on your experience with the company
- A member of HR or security will walk you to your desk and help pack essential items (things you cannot carry will be mailed to you)
- You will be asked to give back your badge and equipment and escorted off the premises same-day
Companies may attempt to use layoffs to remove underperforming employees, but this approach can lead to legal issues if not handled properly. Layoffs should be based on legitimate business needs rather than personal grievances against specific individuals.
Companies can lay off employees, but doing so can harm company culture, employee morale, and overall productivity. Research shows that layoffs often lead to negative consequences for both the employees who are let go and those who remain, making it a challenging decision for organizations.
Under the guise of the corporate layoffs trend, some organizations are downsizing poor performers, malcontents, time-wasters, toxic rumormongers and troublemakers, vanity hires, highly paid professionals and those fighting against returning to the office.
In today's litigious society, laying off workers could end badly for companies. The terminated employees may file claims with the United States Department of Labor asserting that they were let go due to discrimination or biases over race, religion, sexual orientation or age. It could become a public relations nightmare, as the company, its executives and managers would be pilloried on social media and risk losing their jobs for being perceived as racist, ageist or sexist.
There is a domino effect. Since many firms are laying off workers, it's become socially acceptable for businesses to do the same. Once layoffs become socialized, it's easier for other companies to trim their headcount as well. The wave of firings is offering businesses the option to let go of workers under the cloak of "downsizing" to be prudent. They don't have to worry about claims of age, race or other discriminations. After all, they are just being cautious and trimming expenses.
The
war for talent during the Great Resignation pushed businesses to hire and retain workers, even if they didn't meet all necessary job requirements. Managers realized that if they didn't recruit and onboard people quickly, they'd lose out to their competitors.
If seats were left empty, the workload would be dumped on the rest of the team. After a while, the
staff would get frustrated over all the extra hours worked without a pay increase and start updating their résumés and contacting recruiters.
Under the guise of the corporate layoffs trend, some organizations are downsizing poor performers, malcontents, time-wasters, toxic rumormongers and troublemakers, vanity hires, highly paid professionals and those fighting against returning to the office.
www.forbes.com