lizardman99
New Member
I had a high school party a few days ago which was supposed to be a summer BBQ, but other people ended up bringing beer and other drinks. The music was turned up loud and eventually the cops came for a noise complaint. There were people on my lawn and near my house who were obviously drunk when the police officers arrived. Looking out my window I could see they were breathilyzed and given alcohol tickets. A police officer rang my door bell, and i stepped out to talk to him closing the door securely behind me. He asked me why there were drunk people on my lawn, and I told him some people brought beer to my party but I kicked them out, as they were in the front. He asked me if I had been drinking, I told him I wasn't, and submitted to a breathelyzer test. I blew 0.00 because I hadn't been drinking, but the officer insisted he was going to take a look in my house. He had seen nothing actually in the house to give him probable cause that anyone else was drinking, as everyone was in my backyard. I politely said no, and then both the cops came up to me and pressured me to let them in. Not wanting to be blamed for any beer left inside by the drunk people and having my party interrupted, I consistently said no. The officer finally said Ok I'm going to take a look inside. I said officer I consent to no search, but one opened my front door and went in, and another went through the fence gate around to the backyard. They searched my house and gave a couple people MIP's for having beer, and then left. A friend of mine (who's dad is a lawyer that was given an opportunity to be on the defense for John Mark Karr) told me that even if there are drunk people on your lawn, and the police see no evidence of drinking inside the house or in the yard that they can not search your house no matter what they say. He said they must have an actual warrant to search the property. Are these statements correct?