Short Version- a family friend (Bob) named us as executors and sole beneficiaries of his estate. He was involved in a personal injury lawsuit prior to his death which is ongoing. His mother has a living trust (?) that gives half of her house to her daughter and half to Bob. Bob's atty in the lawsuit also drafted the will and is a family friend of the sister. The sister wants us to sign over the other half of the house to her or Bob's 2 sons. (He hadn't spoken to his children in 30 yrs.) In exhange, the family won't contest the will and we will get whatever comes from the lawsuit.
Is it unreasonable for us to ask them to "make us an offer" on the other half of the house? It seems foolish for us to give up the only asset that is a sure thing in exchange for a lawsuit that may or may not be won. This man also had considerable debt- 50K that we know of. Even if the suit is won, after paying his debts, the atty fees, etc. there may be nothing left.
We do not want to cheat these people out of anything, but we also don't want to cheat ourselves-
At this point, should we speak to an atty of our own choosing to get some impartial advice? We aren't comfortable with the relationship that the atty has with the sister.
Thank you!
Is it unreasonable for us to ask them to "make us an offer" on the other half of the house? It seems foolish for us to give up the only asset that is a sure thing in exchange for a lawsuit that may or may not be won. This man also had considerable debt- 50K that we know of. Even if the suit is won, after paying his debts, the atty fees, etc. there may be nothing left.
We do not want to cheat these people out of anything, but we also don't want to cheat ourselves-
At this point, should we speak to an atty of our own choosing to get some impartial advice? We aren't comfortable with the relationship that the atty has with the sister.
Thank you!