Morgage Fee's realted to Divorce

Status
Not open for further replies.

Angel82

New Member
Posted this on another site and needed as much info as possible thank you.... I live in Washington (State) in the US... King county.

Ok so here is my delema.... My husband and I are going through a divorce. We will be legally devorced on Aug. 18 2008. He chose to buy me out and we have had no disputes, I'm not taking alimony or spousal maintenance we agreed on all property which made this easier but one thing I am misunderstanding...

In our divorce papers it state:
Under my name for the division of property it states.....
"$4500 as payment for her interest in the real property awarded to the Respondent. Payment shall be made in full by : the day her name is removed from the title."

Under his name for the division of property it states....
"All right, title and interest in and to the residence and property located at (the house address) together with all rights and benefits related to said property and subject to any encumbrance and/or obligation owing thereon."

Also in our divorce documents it has the hold harmless provision...
"Each party shall hold the other party harmless from any collection action relating to separate or community liabilities set forth above, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in defending against any attempts to collect an obligation of the other party."

Simply right?? NO....

So he called the title company to find out how to switch over the title.... We have to pay a $300 fee for the attorney that takes care of that, ok no problem. But now the morgage company wants $2200 to take my name off the morgage.

My Question...
Am I responsible to pay for or split the cost of my name removal off of the morgage? The more detail I can get about this the better, I appriciate all and any response made.
 
To find the answer you must look at your settlement agreement. I can't tell you. Arguably from what you stated the cost to take your name off the mortgage might be part of the "obligation owing thereon" although I can't be sure. You're certainly best off arguing that his ability to take the property means that he's also supposed to pay all costs in order to be able to get such a deal. Most important, look at all the writing you have as chances are the answer can be found there. Good luck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top