I'm wondering what type of band agreement would make the most sense for my situation. I've been working on building this music project on my own for the last 3 years. I came up with the concept, wrote all the instrumentation for 10 songs (no vocals), built a rehearsal/practice studio, came up with a name, and built a web site.
The vocalist I work with will be writing all their own parts, but the other musicians (bass, guitar) will be learning the songs that already exist, and possibly do some type of collaboration.
I had a band agreement drawn up that says that I am the sole proprietor (meaning I own the project, and can make decisions), and other members get paid an equal share for all gigs played, and all compositions they contribute. The problem is I've had 2 musicians now that didn't want to sign it because they feel they should own an equal part of the band. That doesn't make sense to me since they are walking into a project where I have already done all the initial work, not to mention I'm providing the rehearsal space. Is this agreement really unfair? If so, how should it be structured?
Thanks
The vocalist I work with will be writing all their own parts, but the other musicians (bass, guitar) will be learning the songs that already exist, and possibly do some type of collaboration.
I had a band agreement drawn up that says that I am the sole proprietor (meaning I own the project, and can make decisions), and other members get paid an equal share for all gigs played, and all compositions they contribute. The problem is I've had 2 musicians now that didn't want to sign it because they feel they should own an equal part of the band. That doesn't make sense to me since they are walking into a project where I have already done all the initial work, not to mention I'm providing the rehearsal space. Is this agreement really unfair? If so, how should it be structured?
Thanks