NY Times 'Never Trumper' Stephens Admits Misunderstanding & Mislabeling DJT

army judge

Super Moderator
A New York Times opinion columnist and self-proclaimed "Never Trumper" conservative says it's time for President-elect Donald Trump's "perennial" critics "to drop the heavy moralizing and incessant doomsaying" concerning the next chief executive and his incoming administration.

Bret Stephens, in a recent column, wrote that after nine years, he no longer considers himself a Never Trumper. He says that he and others like him never truly understood what made Trump popular and effective.

"Who, and what, is Trump?" Stephens asked. "He's a man and the symbol of a movement. The man is crass but charismatic, ignorant but intuitive, dishonest but authentic. The movement is patriotic — and angry."

Some of that anger, Stephens added, is "correctly directed at a self-satisfied elite that thinks it knows better but often doesn't."

Also, Stephens said, Trump understood during the 2024 campaign that "ordinary people" cared greatly about the high cost of living and the migrant crisis at the southern border.

The columnist basically said he and other Never Trumpers were hypocritical and ignorant when it came to Trump.

"How come so many who denounce Trump as a sexual predator were, 20 years earlier, Bill Clinton's steadfast defenders?" the columnist wrote on Dec. 17. "Why were the same people who demanded investigations into every corner of the Trump family's business dealings so incurious about the Biden family's dealings, like the curiously high prices for Hunter's paintings?"

In creating fear by insisting Trump could lead the U.S. into World War III, was too friendly with Russian President Vladimir Putin, and would ruin the Republican Party, Never Trumpers overstated the possibilities, according to Stephens.

"[We] missed that his working-class appeal would also reach working-class minorities — like the 48 percent of Latino male voters who cast their ballots for him last month," Stephens wrote. "And we were alarmed by Trump's protectionism and big-spending ways. But the economy mostly thrived under him, at least until the pandemic."

When it came to the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021 – the No. 1 reason Stephens voted for Vice President Kamala Harris this year – Never Trumpers misread that, too.

"f democracy means anything, it's that ordinary people, not elites, get to decide how important an event like Jan. 6 is to them. Turns out, not so much," Stephens wrote.

Never Trumpers never quite grasped that Americans also felt lied to by the left — see Biden's physical and mental decline — and saw the "torrent of Israel-bashing and antisemitism that emerged from the cultural left after Oct. 7," Stephens wrote.

Now, Stephens encourages other Never Trumpers to change their ways.

"So here's a thought for Trump's perennial critics, including those of us on the right," Stephens wrote to end his column. "Let's enter the new year by wishing the new administration well, by giving some of Trump's cabinet picks the benefit of the doubt, by dropping the lurid historical comparisons to past dictators, by not sounding paranoid about the ever-looming end of democracy, by hoping for the best and knowing that we need to fight the wrongs that are real and not merely what we fear, that whatever happens, this too shall pass."







 
I wish the Trump the best in taking this country where it should go. I want him to succeed in that because the whole country would benefit from it. But given some of his statements of what he intends to do and the nominations for cabinent and other positions I'm not very hopeful that's what we'll get. His tax and spending plans, for example, will massively add to the public debt, which is not healthy for the long term. From Trump's public statements he does not appear to understand how taxes affect the economy (though he's keenly aware of what tax moves are politically popular). Neither party has come anywhere to close to putting out a viable plan to balancing the budget, much starting to chip away at the pile we have. That's just one of the many problems confronting the country that each administration just keeps avoiding because they want to play it safe politically. We can't keep avoiding these problems forever and hope they go away by themselves. Populism has never been very good at solving difficult problems.

I think it more likely we'll get four more years of the parties sniping and insulting each other, doing the bare minimum to keep the government going, and driving the country further apart. In order to change that, I think Trump will have to morph himself from a divider to a uniter. For someone who relishes a fight as much he does that may be too much of a stretch for him to achieve. However, I would be quite happy if he (along with Congress) manages to significantly exceed my low expectations.
 

Ask a Question

Back
Top