Ok, I've been losing sleep over this for several days and need to know whether or not this was appropriate. For some contextual knowledge, I'm 25, female.
I recently was pulled over for expired registration, and told my vehicle was going to be towed and stored. Completely understandable, my own fault for not paying the registration. The officer (county sheriff, male) ran my name, etc., as is standard when pulled over. Other than expired registration, I have valid, current insurance, and no restrictions on my driver's license. I also have no prior charges, no criminal convictions, no arrests, etc. Clean record. I don't use drugs of any type, nor do I drink alcohol.
The officer came back and told me they would need to search the vehicle. I understand this completely - if they are taking it into their possession, they need to make sure there are no weapons or drugs in it. The officer had me step out of my car and follow him back to his squad car. I was completely calm and cooperative - my own fault for not paying the registration. By this time, another male police officer had shown up and was waiting at the car. The first one told me that I was not under arrest, but they would have to search my person.
They had me stand with my back to the car, hands behind my back, as standard. Then, the first officer (both were male) proceeded to put both hands down the inside of my pants, touching skin with his palms all the way around my hips and waist.
Neither asked me to empty my pockets first, nor did he pat me down before. I was driving home from work, so I was dressed in typical office clothing, slim fitting slacks and a sweater- nothing baggy, any weapons would have been easily visible. And, needless to say, he didn't find anything hidden.
I suppose my questions are these:
1. I thought searches of one's person had to be conducted by an officer of the same sex. Is this wrong?
2. Was there any obvious probable cause to conduct a search of my person? (The vehicle is understandable.)
3. Was putting his hands down my pants inappropriate? (in terms of the law, not morally. I realize it was morally wrong.)
Any confirmation on any of this would really be appreciated. Thanks.
I recently was pulled over for expired registration, and told my vehicle was going to be towed and stored. Completely understandable, my own fault for not paying the registration. The officer (county sheriff, male) ran my name, etc., as is standard when pulled over. Other than expired registration, I have valid, current insurance, and no restrictions on my driver's license. I also have no prior charges, no criminal convictions, no arrests, etc. Clean record. I don't use drugs of any type, nor do I drink alcohol.
The officer came back and told me they would need to search the vehicle. I understand this completely - if they are taking it into their possession, they need to make sure there are no weapons or drugs in it. The officer had me step out of my car and follow him back to his squad car. I was completely calm and cooperative - my own fault for not paying the registration. By this time, another male police officer had shown up and was waiting at the car. The first one told me that I was not under arrest, but they would have to search my person.
They had me stand with my back to the car, hands behind my back, as standard. Then, the first officer (both were male) proceeded to put both hands down the inside of my pants, touching skin with his palms all the way around my hips and waist.
Neither asked me to empty my pockets first, nor did he pat me down before. I was driving home from work, so I was dressed in typical office clothing, slim fitting slacks and a sweater- nothing baggy, any weapons would have been easily visible. And, needless to say, he didn't find anything hidden.
I suppose my questions are these:
1. I thought searches of one's person had to be conducted by an officer of the same sex. Is this wrong?
2. Was there any obvious probable cause to conduct a search of my person? (The vehicle is understandable.)
3. Was putting his hands down my pants inappropriate? (in terms of the law, not morally. I realize it was morally wrong.)
Any confirmation on any of this would really be appreciated. Thanks.