Disabled Vet
Well-Known Member
Question if I may.
Person was being sued for credit card debt. Person was sued in Superior court and court found default judgement because person never showed.
Person then receives summons by sheriff dept to appear for garnishment hearing. Now comes the question by person, when was the judgement even hear? Reason: they didn't get the summons nor did they know about 1st hearing.
So the day comes for the garnishment hearing. Person arrives at court house, there is a sign directing people to room. Inside this room is a clerk when everyone checks in. Person checks in. Hearing was set at 10am. at 10:10 the creditor (Plaintiff) walks in, picks up person folder from table. Calls the person over, person had presented documents showing their only income was Social Security. Creditor (plaintiff) then states that they would just close the file in their office.
Now.... There wasn't a court hearing on the garnishment nor was there a court order stating that person income was SS and was not garnishable. Just the meeting between person and plaintiff. my question is How does a court allow a creditor (plaintiff) to control a hearing? Shouldn't have all the papers gone before the judge to make the ruling?
Thanks
Michael
Person was being sued for credit card debt. Person was sued in Superior court and court found default judgement because person never showed.
Person then receives summons by sheriff dept to appear for garnishment hearing. Now comes the question by person, when was the judgement even hear? Reason: they didn't get the summons nor did they know about 1st hearing.
So the day comes for the garnishment hearing. Person arrives at court house, there is a sign directing people to room. Inside this room is a clerk when everyone checks in. Person checks in. Hearing was set at 10am. at 10:10 the creditor (Plaintiff) walks in, picks up person folder from table. Calls the person over, person had presented documents showing their only income was Social Security. Creditor (plaintiff) then states that they would just close the file in their office.
Now.... There wasn't a court hearing on the garnishment nor was there a court order stating that person income was SS and was not garnishable. Just the meeting between person and plaintiff. my question is How does a court allow a creditor (plaintiff) to control a hearing? Shouldn't have all the papers gone before the judge to make the ruling?
Thanks
Michael