T
Ther
Guest
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
I moved out of my rental property a month and a half ago. The rental company was actively trying to rent out my property for the month after I moved out. I have screen shots of their ads online saying the property was ready one week after my move out. 28 days after I moved out, they sent me an email stating that they could not get back to me on my security deposit request as the were processing invoices. When I called, the assistant informed me that this was a standard email they sent to all of their tenants. Just yesterday, a month and a half (45 days) after I moved out, they emailed me invoices dated the 5th of July and the 8th of July. These invoices totaled to roughly $1800 more than my security deposit, and included things such as "Painted entire house, removed and replaced carpet, removed wasps nest," etc. My question is this: If the company obviously felt that the property was not unlivable, because they were actively trying to rent it out during the 30 days after I moved, and began to collect invoices after 30 days had passed, even though they sent the standard email 7-10 days earlier, can they charge me my security deposit and expect me to pay $1800 over that amount. It seems like they are trying to make the house look brand new, and expecting me to pay for it.
They also did not take into consideration the amortization of the carpet when charging me.
And they also did not give me a checklist upon my move-in, inspect the house before I moved in, or give me a checklist upon my move out. They could not have known, then, what shape the walls or carpet were in when I moved in (pretty shabby), and could not have known what damage was done by the tenant before me.
The whole situation seems shady, and I was just curious if you guys think I have a case to object and possibly appeal these charges.
Thanks,
They also did not take into consideration the amortization of the carpet when charging me.
And they also did not give me a checklist upon my move-in, inspect the house before I moved in, or give me a checklist upon my move out. They could not have known, then, what shape the walls or carpet were in when I moved in (pretty shabby), and could not have known what damage was done by the tenant before me.
The whole situation seems shady, and I was just curious if you guys think I have a case to object and possibly appeal these charges.
Thanks,