Refuse to pay pre-existent carpet damage with evidence

Status
Not open for further replies.

Argielaw

New Member
Hello:

My apartment's leasing agreement in Virginia expired in May 2005. At my exit I had an apartment review with the building manager. The manager identified some bleach stains in the carpet and later charged me with $190. There were other stains in the carpet which I recognized as mine.

I reviewed my in-form from May 2004. And I said there that the carpet was clean but marked and 'x' in the comments section. Because there were many comments, I attached a separated sheet of paper with those. In that sheet, I explained that there were some spots in the carpet that looked like an excess of bleach.

The same day I delivered the in-form and my attachment, I received a technician to work-out my other comments. I have a document that shows this visit and the reasons on it match my comments in my attachment.

The renter (a NY real estate company) sent the claim to a credit collection company. I explained my case to this people and after faxing all the papers and an extensive explanation, they said: 'pay or you will be reported. You said the carpet was clean. The only valid form is the in-form'. I asked if they reviewed all my documents and they said: 'talk to the building manager'.

I think I have enough material to show the bleach stains were there. I only want to pay the part of the bill for the other stains.

Thank you.
 
Argielaw said:
Hello:

My apartment's leasing agreement in Virginia expired in May 2005. At my exit I had an apartment review with the building manager. The manager identified some bleach stains in the carpet and later charged me with $190. There were other stains in the carpet which I recognized as mine.

I reviewed my in-form from May 2004. And I said there that the carpet was clean but marked and 'x' in the comments section. Because there were many comments, I attached a separated sheet of paper with those. In that sheet, I explained that there were some spots in the carpet that looked like an excess of bleach.

The same day I delivered the in-form and my attachment, I received a technician to work-out my other comments. I have a document that shows this visit and the reasons on it match my comments in my attachment.

The renter (a NY real estate company) sent the claim to a credit collection company. I explained my case to this people and after faxing all the papers and an extensive explanation, they said: 'pay or you will be reported. You said the carpet was clean. The only valid form is the in-form'. I asked if they reviewed all my documents and they said: 'talk to the building manager'.

I think I have enough material to show the bleach stains were there. I only want to pay the part of the bill for the other stains.

Thank you.
I'm confused by this story because it seems that the agency cleaned the carpet that was stained by you. If you are questioning whether you should be responsible for the whole cleaning because only some of the stains were yours, I'm not sure you have a case. if the carpet needed to be cleaned because of your stains than paying for a carpet cleaning doesn't seem to be inappropriate. I'm not sure the basis for your dispute. You still might be able to bargain down the amount with the collecitons agency.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top