Night Cabbie
New Member
- Jurisdiction
- Oklahoma
This is Oregon, not Oklahoma! But I don't seem to have the option of changing that or deleting the thread and starting over.
I rented a room in my apt. to a kid who had never rented before, starting August 1st. When he first moved in, I asked him to use Feliways stress spray on his shoes and bags so he'd smell friendly to my four cats. Only to be told that I couldn't tell him what to do, for according to his girlfriend who stayed with us for ten days, it wasn't my home anymore, since he paid rent too.
After three days, I told them that the cats had started marking in the house because they were refusing to use the Feliways or even SPEAK to me. A week later they went camping to get around the management company's rule about houseguests not staying for more than ten consecutive days; my opinion was irrelevant.
So I informed him, in writing, that I now had a section of hardwood floor that was so badly urine damaged that it would have to be replaced, and that this behavior stopped as soon as he left. Therefore, if I could afford to give him his full first/last/security back so he could leave sooner, I would, but since I couldn't, I was giving him notice for the end of September, with the caveat that if he wanted a full 60 days I would of course do that. He agreed to leave then, in writing. Only to change his mind the next day; he left August 15th.
He emailed me two days later to inform me that he had signed himself off the lease, and demanded a refund for September's rent and his full security deposit. He doesn't think he should have to pay for the damage, since it was caused by my cats. Whereas I think that he should, as his refusal to use Feliways or be even remotely friendly to either me or them caused them to freak out. But I can of course see how how that is disputable.
However, do I actually have to give him September's rent back? I have to repair this floor somehow. Also, if I must give him the deposit back, does it need to be within 30 days of when he was expected to leave, or the day he actually left?
I rented a room in my apt. to a kid who had never rented before, starting August 1st. When he first moved in, I asked him to use Feliways stress spray on his shoes and bags so he'd smell friendly to my four cats. Only to be told that I couldn't tell him what to do, for according to his girlfriend who stayed with us for ten days, it wasn't my home anymore, since he paid rent too.
After three days, I told them that the cats had started marking in the house because they were refusing to use the Feliways or even SPEAK to me. A week later they went camping to get around the management company's rule about houseguests not staying for more than ten consecutive days; my opinion was irrelevant.
So I informed him, in writing, that I now had a section of hardwood floor that was so badly urine damaged that it would have to be replaced, and that this behavior stopped as soon as he left. Therefore, if I could afford to give him his full first/last/security back so he could leave sooner, I would, but since I couldn't, I was giving him notice for the end of September, with the caveat that if he wanted a full 60 days I would of course do that. He agreed to leave then, in writing. Only to change his mind the next day; he left August 15th.
He emailed me two days later to inform me that he had signed himself off the lease, and demanded a refund for September's rent and his full security deposit. He doesn't think he should have to pay for the damage, since it was caused by my cats. Whereas I think that he should, as his refusal to use Feliways or be even remotely friendly to either me or them caused them to freak out. But I can of course see how how that is disputable.
However, do I actually have to give him September's rent back? I have to repair this floor somehow. Also, if I must give him the deposit back, does it need to be within 30 days of when he was expected to leave, or the day he actually left?
Last edited: