Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to our legal community! Click here or the create new topic button to ask a question and receive answers and comments from our friendly and helpful legal community.
Articles that answer frequent legal questions are in our Law Guide. Important legal news is reported in The Law JournalYou can find a lawyer near you in the Lawyer Directory. If you know that you need to hire an attorney, you can submit a case review from a lawyer.
Thank you for your response. I'm trying to fix the orphographic mistake on the title but...I doubt it. But all you can do is call around and ask.
You got a cease and desist letter. Quote it to us word for word and you might get some helpful comments.
They are willing to spend a much higher than $5000 amount on legal fees refusing to peacefully solve the problem.
Thank you very much.There is no way FREE information can beat back a licensed attorney.
The internet and its alleged FREE help is useless to you at this point if you value your business.
You have already revealed and admitted far too much via your correspondence.
You don't give away your products, and lawyers don't give away their services.
I suggest you discuss this issue with three or four local trademark attorneys.
You have placed your livelihood in a precarious position by communicating with your accuser.
Your best option now is to hire an attorney, or risk devastating financial consequences by pursuing FREE (often faulty or flawed) advice.
I wish you well.
It's very much informative.Sorry to hear about your legal problem. Your business name is your "trade mark" - it is the "mark" of your trade - your business. Filing for a "federal trademark" is a different story. It grants the right holder protection over the name across the country.
Some of your points made are good ones but no one here can say where this will ultimately go. This is because only a court can make a decision on whether one trade mark is in violation of another, with the standard being the 'likelihood of confusion' of consumers in the marketplace. This is not a simple task and, what we may think may not be what evidence may yield and what the decision of those authorized to rule on a legal matter may find.
There is a similarity between your two names. A right holder will always want to have broad protection that may extend beyond legal rights. It's difficult for any of us to say whether that is the case here because it's not a clearly defined boundary.
Registering for a corporation in New York does not imply, infer or grant any trademark rights. You're advised to perform a trademark search before you register a company name.
You've also got some other challenges in your filing being in 2016 and the Doughnuttery having used the name in New York City and their federal trademark application predating your own registration. They also seem to have registered the name in conjunction with both food (donuts) and restaurant services. This doesn't mean that you definitely have a problem but, if a judge finds there is a likelihood of confusion in the marketplace, your claim would be inferior to theirs.
Chances of a lawyer taking this case for free / pro bono or the bar association providing the same will likely not happen. There are usually far more needy persons who require assistance that are likely higher on the priority list, e.g. those who are destitute, those who are afflicted by a particularly troubling legal issue or series of claims, etc. And there is no contingency here for potential monetary reward, e.g. if the lawyer wins the case there isn't likely a large recovery justifying their costs and efforts.
Litigating a trademark case (intellectual property) is usually expensive. This may be why the offer increased but it is up to you to decide how to proceed. Given that your business identity is very important, I'd highly advise you to obtain a proper legal consultation with an experienced trademark attorney. That's the best I can say right now and best of luck.
I should make clear too that my name, Brooklyn Doughnutry, is not trademarked. The word Doughnutry simply means a place where doughnuts are made (bake - bakery, dentist - dentistry) when Doughuttery is just a play on that. My name also has Brooklyn in front of it.I should make clear that the term 'trademark' is an English word as defined by Websters and in our own Law Dictionary defining trademark. It is a business and legal term. Filing for federal or state protection or having legal common law rights extends the meaning of that term to a series of actions which will determine your legally recognized right to use the term and enforce that right against others, as is the case here. Good luck.
Thanks a lot.It's a good argument but it's not a recognized English word, just an application of the word. I don't see it in the Oxford or Webster's English Dictionary. However, I've seen it used in searches in the manner you believe it to be used.
The answer as to how the law should be applied may not be clear. For example, if you used "Brooklyn Krispy Kreme" then it wouldn't matter that you've also included the location of your business in your name. The second half is a unique term, not an English word, and thus would very likely be confused as associated with the famous doughnut franchise, Krispy Kreme.
However, in your case, the question of whether 'doghnutry' is perceived as a place where donuts / doughnuts are made (or other similar meaning) and similar to other recognized words using an 'ry' suffix such as dentistry or armory is difficult to ascertain. It's not a clear case and also why the trademark owner may be facing a costly trademark prosecution trying to determine whether they do have rights to what seems to be a "suggestive" or "descriptive" word or term.
You probably do yourself little good by writing to a trained professional who will use your words against you if he can. His job is to protect his client and their business. There are two choices here: (1) fight it out in court and someone will face a significant financial loss; (2) settle the case either with him buying out whatever right you may have or being able to create some co-existence agreement without infringement of each others rights, which may not happen - and certainly shouldn't without you having a trademark lawyer representing you and who understands all the details in this case and your rights which may apply (and your leverage.) Understand that if he doesn't prosecute, he may face a problem with establishing his trademark rights going forward.
That's the best I can offer in terms of insight. It's your livelihood and business. Do yourself a favor and hire an experienced trademark lawyer.
Is it possible to find a free attorney to defend my small business from trademark harassment?
Appreciate your response.As much chance of finding anyone else to do important things for free. Do you and your business work for free? Why would you think a lawyer might work for free?
FWIW, I will tell you that your best argument is that "doghnuttery" or "doughnutry" (the spelling differences are inconsequential) is a generic term for any store that sells donuts and, therefore, is not protectible under federal or state trademark law. At worst (for you), it's descriptive and, therefore, requires evidence of secondary meaning to be protectible. I'd also point out that your letter in response to the initial C&D letter confuses the word marks and the graphical marks, which are two separate things.
Now I want to save my company name because the whole thing makes me furious.
They are willing to spend a much higher than $5000 amount on legal fees refusing to peacefully solve the problem.
It's basic math. $5000 is my expense for changing name. Do you need a professional estimate?This layman's advice.
You sell donuts in NYC, they sell donuts in NYC.
You're infringing.
Take the $1000 and change your business name to Brooklyn Donuts (assuming there is no other business called Brooklyn Donuts).
Oh, now you're furious. You were happy to change your name for $5000. Now you're mad because you only got offered $1000. Sounds more like greed, not anger.
Are you?
You'll spend a lot more than $5000 to fight this in court. Who has the deeper pockets, you or them?
This discussion can be endless but I don't want to waste more of your time. Thank you very much for such a professional advice.The advice to you is to try to calm down and make a good rational decision, even though I can understand how emotional this is and how upset you must be. You just enjoy making donuts and don't want to deal with this hassle. But they probably will not allow you to just make donuts using this name within a few blocks... maybe they will but I wouldn't be confident since they appear to have a federal trademark and money behind them.
The points given by @adjusterjack are valid. And as I mentioned, you're not starting out in a strong position. If your business trade name is worth enough money, consider the chances of a defense. If "Brooklyn Donuts" works for you, then consider a strategy that perhaps you can get a settlement amount that at least covers costs.
Getting a lawyer will also cost you money - and it may or may not help you get a better settlement. It's impossible for anyone to know the better road forward. Perhaps if you give them a take it or leave it offer that covers your expenses, they may agree. But be prepared to have to sign an agreement you may need an attorney to review too (so that will be calculated into your expenses.)
Sorry you have such a problem but these are the options you have - fighting it (probably not a strong position from the little I know) or settling it (and trying to get your expenses.) It's a tough call but you have to make it. Good luck.