Serving a reply to bill of particulars

I

Iain

New Member
Jurisdiction
New York
Does a reply to a bill of particulars.need to be served or can I efile this to the New York Supreme Court?

also can I serve on the defendant or do I serve on their lawyers?

thanks so much.
 
New York Supreme Court
The process server served a complaint and summons on 3rd March 2022 at 11:13am. These were hand delivered to defendant.

Defendant only filed an an answer on 24th March. This is 21 days after service. I understood an answer must be provided in 20 days in New York Supreme Court?

did defendant answer ?
 
Sort of educated guess.

If the court has a process for efiling documents, you should be able to use it. Just make sure you follow up online to see that it's docketed.

You serve it on the defendant's lawyer.

Please keep all your questions about the lawsuit in this thread. I've moved the questions here and deleted the other threads.

Iain said:
Defendant put the wrong name of the plaintiff on the answer to a complaint and summons in Supreme Court.

given the error is the answer considered late as it named the plaintiff wrongly?
Click to expand...

Iain said:
New York Supreme Court
The process server served a complaint and summons on 3rd March 2022 at 11:13am. These were hand delivered to defendant.

Defendant only filed an an answer on 24th March. This is 21 days after service. I understood an answer must be provided in 20 days in New York Supreme Court?

did defendant answer ?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Defendant put the wrong name of the plaintiff on the answer to a complaint and summons in Supreme Court.

given the error is the answer considered late as it named the plaintiff wrongly?
 
Judges don't like people who try to take advantage of technicalities, especially minor ones.

The judge is likely to allow the defendant to correct the name or, at least, take notice in the court file as to the correct name.

Same with delay in the answer. The judge is likely to also excuse the delay.
 
adjusterjack said:
Judges don't like people who try to take advantage of technicalities, especially minor ones.

The judge is likely to allow the defendant to correct the name or, at least, take notice in the court file as to the correct name.

Same with delay in the answer. The judge is likely to also excuse the delay.
Click to expand...

Case is not under judicial review. Given answer was late and my name was completely wrong can I file a withdrawal without the defendants agreement?
 
adjusterjack said:
What does that mean?



You're the one that filed the lawsuit. Why would you want to withdraw?
Click to expand...
The case was submitted but a request for judicial review has not been done yet by me.

It is going to be very difficult. The defendant has blatantly lied in their answer which is easily shown. It may damage my health to continue this case. The defendant is known for dishonesty and obstruction. Lawyers are afraid to take them on. This may last years but if I don't challenge them their buses will continue to kill. They mowed down a 15 year old boy on a crosswalk in February……..buses are breaking law all the time. One of these buses almost killed me.

Left me with really bad ptsd.came within a foot of crushing me when I was crossing on the crosswalk. Cop witnessed bus breaking law and acknowledged this to me. I got his badge number.

i am suing for negligent infliction of emotional distress (ptsd). The issue is that the bus did not hit me. I will need to challenge the interpretation of the law that physical contact must take place. The law is completely wrong on this, based on established scientific fact.

I am collecting expert medical testimony. It's clear that physical contact is not required for physical injury. Basically a life threatening event triggers structural physical changes in the brain that effectively are brain damage. The physical changes result directly from the life threatening experience to structurally change the neural networks. It's why life threatening trauma leads to ptsd. It damages the physical structures of the neural networks.

if the court goes with scientific evidence above it will cause a fundamental shift in law for emotional injuries.
 

Share this page

Get a free case review from a lawyer
Back
Top