SHAMELESS FAUX LAWFARE FEDERAL CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST DJT DISMISSED!!!

army judge

Super Moderator
Lackluster, Lying, Boring Persecutor Jerk (the sneaky snake) Smith slithers away, shamed and embarrassed by his phony, fraudulent persecution of President-elect Donald J. Trump.


Nov. 25, 2024, 12:16 PM CST / Updated Nov. 25, 2024, 4:00 PM CST


By Ryan J. Reilly and Ken Dilanian
WASHINGTON — Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday filed motions to drop all federal charges against President-elect Donald Trump regarding his mishandling of classified documents and his effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election in the lead-up to the deadly Jan. 6 attack on the U.S Capitol.

Hours later, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan granted Smith's motion to dismiss the Jan. 6-related indictment, formally bringing to an end the case that alleged Trump unlawfully conspired to overturn his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.

Trump was first indicted in June 2023 in a federal court in Miami on 37 felony counts related to mishandling classified documents that he took from the White House to his Florida home. They included willful retention of national defense information, making false statements, and conspiracy to obstruct justice. A Florida judge dismissed the case, but Smith's office had sought an appeal.


Trump was separately indicted on four felonies in August 2023 for his attempt to reverse the 2020 election results: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding and conspiracy against rights.


1732572262166.png
Special Counsel Jack Smith arrives to announce the indictment of former President Donald Trump during a press conference on Aug. 1, 2023 in Washington, D.C. Ricky Carioti/ / The Washington Post / Getty Images

The case was then put on hold for months as Trump's team argued that the case should be thrown out for multiple reasons, including that a former president cannot be prosecuted for his actions in office.

Trump has claimed that the prosecutions were politically motivated. He has never publicly conceded that his election claims were, in fact, false, and he pleaded not guilty in both federal cases.

The federal indictments of Trump marked an extraordinary moment in American history — the first-ever accusation that a president sought illegally to cling to power, mishandled classified information and attempted to obstruct a federal investigation.

Their dismissal also marks a historic moment. Fifty years after lawmakers from both parties forced Richard Nixon to resign the presidency amid allegations of criminal conduct in office, half of American voters chose to return Trump to the presidency.

Trump's election victory means that the Justice Department's longstanding position that a sitting president cannot be charged with a crime will apply to Trump after he takes office on Jan. 20.

"That prohibition is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government's proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Government stands fully behind," Smith's office wrote in Monday's filing.

"The Government's position on the merits of the defendant's prosecution has not changed. But the circumstances have," the special counsel added.

The DOJ policy, which was adopted during the Watergate scandal, notes that Congress has the power to impeach a president if they commit crimes. It is designed to allow sitting presidents to perform their duties without being hindered by legal cases.

That legal position from DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel is the same one that helped Trump avoid being charged in connection with Robert Mueller's special counsel probe during Trump's first presidency. Mueller's team decided that they could not reach a final conclusion on whether they believed Trump committed a crime, since they could not charge a sitting president.

Charging Trump was "not an option we could consider," Mueller explained in 2019. Now the same OLC opinion is preventing Smith's case from going forward.

Two weeks later, the Trump-appointed federal judge overseeing the classified documents case, Aileen Cannon, threw out all of the charges against Trump accusing him of mishandling classified documents and attempting to obstruct the investigation.

In a decision that legal experts widely criticized and that Smith vowed to appeal, Cannon found that Smith had not been properly appointed as a special counsel. The surprise ruling reversed decades of past rulings by both liberal and conservative judges.

In August, a new federal grand jury indicted Trump on the same four charges in the election case, alleging that Trump's false claims about mass voter fraud during the 2020 election were "unsupported, objectively unreasonable, and ever-changing" and that Trump "knew that they were false." But Trump's re-election ended Smith's ability to move forward with those charges.

Trump spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement, "Today's decision by the DOJ ends the unconstitutional federal cases against President Trump, and is a major victory for the rule of law. The American People and President Trump want an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and we look forward to uniting our country."

Many Jan. 6 defendants have told judges they lament that they were "gullible" enough to fall for Trump's falsehoods, which were echoed by the president-elect's allies, Republicans in Congress and conservative influencers on social media.

The Justice Department is focused on arresting the "most egregious" rioters before Trump returns to office. The president-elect has said he will pardon some undetermined portion of Jan. 6 rioters, whom he's called "warriors," "unbelievable patriots," political prisoners and "hostages."


He is expected to walk through the lower west tunnel, where some of the worst violence of Jan. 6 took place, to be sworn in as president on Jan. 20, 2025.


 
I disagree with you regarding the indictment. The court's dismissal had nothing to with the merits of the case, which you know very well from being a federal judge yourself. The case might well have succeeded had the Supreme Court not significantly raised the procedural bar for prosecuting a president. Some Trump supporters seem to think it impossible that Trump could violate the law. I am not under that same illusion.
 
As was stated by a wise man in another place (anonymous sharing approved by author):

"No man is above the law" is no longer a truism in this country. Trump has become king.
 
Kings, Emperors, Dictators, and all others who PRESUME themselves to be deity, monarchs, ayatollahs, moolah, or any other aclimation (as in moniker) no longer exist.

Sure, there's the obese, midget character in Noko, Iran currently has an ayatollah, however the Israelis are working to dethrone that critter.

Once human beings taste, live, and enjoy REAL freedom; they tend not to seek to live in, or under the thumb, and at the whim of an unstable freak.

Trump doesn't profess, nor does he seek to become a king, potentate, grand poobah, royalty, dictator, or usurper of power.

Trump views himself as a former president, currently knows he President-elect, and on January 20th he'll once more once become the sitting, serving President of the United States.

As one of millions of Americans who was granted the honor of wearing our nation's soldier uniform; serving to protect the freedoms we all enjoy, I learned a great deal about usurper of power.

Besides, if Trump or any other former two term president should seek reelection, he/she will summarily be denied.

Elephants know the TRUE, ORIGINAL USURPER of power in this country was the INFAMOUS, SCANDALOUS, FDR; a broken down, afflicted donkey!!!!

By the way, even a village idiot recognizes deflection and it's pal, "gaslighting".



1732711905237.png
 
Kings, Emperors, Dictators, and all others who PRESUME themselves to be deity, monarchs, ayatollahs, moolah, or any other aclimation (as in moniker) no longer exist.

Sure they do. President Putin of Russia, President Xi of China, President Díaz-Canel of Cuba, President Kim of North Korea, President Maduro of Venezuela (on whom the U.S. imposed even further sanctions today), are but a few of those who, though all using the title President, are all dictators plaguing the world right now. Holding the title of President does not infer leading a free nation.
 
Sure they do. President Putin of Russia, President Xi of China, President Díaz-Canel of Cuba, President Kim of North Korea, President Maduro of Venezuela (on whom the U.S. imposed even further sanctions today), are but a few of those who, though all using the title President, are all dictators plaguing the world right now. Holding the title of President does not infer leading a free nation.
I think you are projecting how you would be a president. Not every person elected President of the US has an ego that big. Some in our history truly want to do what is right for the Country. Sigmund Freud would love you.
 
I think you are projecting how you would be a president.

Not at all. I have a very high regard for the Constitution. Nor was I commenting specifically on Trump either. I was simply pointing out that ArmyJudge's statement that:
Kings, Emperors, Dictators, and all others who PRESUME themselves to be deity, monarchs, ayatollahs, moolah, or any other aclimation (as in moniker) no longer exist.

Dictators definitely still exist and billions of people suffer living under those despots. The Iranian Ayatolla is not the only one or even the worst one, as his post seems to suggest. Might Trump like to be a dictator if he had the chance? I think he would, but fortunately the rules of our Republic will constrain him from achieving that, at least so long as most Americans are willing to oppose any obvious power grab he might try.

While he may not become dictator, the start he's making towards his second term suggest that things may not go well for the nation if he gets his way. I've already discussed before the problems high tariffs create and yet Trump seems determined to pursue that course of action. Tariffs are not a good way to raise revenue and, contrary to what Trump said on his stump speeches, it is not the foreign country or the foreign businesses that pay the tariffs. It is the American buyers that pay for that. In short, he's proposing a tax increase on Americans who buy foreign goods. That strategy is typically only used to punish nations are engaging in unfair trade practices by making their goods and services more expensive and thus putting them on a more level playing field with similar U.S. goods.

Which is why it is particularly baffling that the first country he targets is Canada, which is a long time ally of the U.S., one of our biggest trading partners, and country with we have a comprehensive trade agreement — an agreement that Trump himself pushed for and signed in 2018. So what does he hope to gain from that, apart from alienating Canada? There is no logic to it. Is he saying he f**d up signing that agreement? After all, if he believed the agreement was a good one then what does he achieve by shredding it and starting a trade war with Canada? If he still believes it was a good thing to do, then what exactly is the problem he trying by slapping tariffs on a country that is playing by the rules that he himself approved? I think before his term is done he'll come to regret pushing those high tariffs if they are ever implemented. The history of high tariffs and trade wars is littered with many examples of economic disaster for those participating in those practices.

Similarly I'm concerned about his nomination choices. He's not taking enough time to a good job of vetting candidates in his haste to get things. Nominating people like Gaetz and RFK, JR. to cabinent positions is not the mark of someone looking to fill the jobs with competent experienced people.

I'm not seeing anything that suggests he has a cohesive vision or goal with the things he's done so far. All I'm seeing is the same kind inconsistency and chaos that was the hallmark of his first term.
 
Tariffs are not a good way to raise revenue and, contrary to what Trump said on his stump speeches, it is not the foreign country or the foreign businesses that pay the tariffs.
Trump is not trying to raise revenue with tariffs. The threat of tariffs is a subterfuge to bargain with, and it has already worked with Mexico and Canada as reported in the new.

Trump said the import duties on Mexico and Canada would only be removed once illegal immigration and drug trafficking to the US had stopped.

After a phone call on Wednesday, Trump posted online: "She has agreed to stop Migration through Mexico, and into the United States, effectively closing our Southern Border."

Trump called the conversation "wonderful" and "very productive" in a post on Truth Social, saying the two leaders talked about the border control and how to combat the flow of illegal drugs -- but these topical conversation points may be the only things on which the two could entirely agree.

Sheinbaum confirmed that she had spoken with Trump, and that they did discuss the shared border, writing on X: "I had an excellent conversation with President Donald Trump. We discussed Mexico's strategy on the migration phenomenon and I shared that caravans are not arriving at the northern border because they are being taken care of in Mexico."

So, we just have to wait and see what happens.

Trudeau says he spoke to Trump in wake of tariff threat

"It was a good call," Trudeau said this morning.

MICKEY DJURIC
11/26/2024, 10:23AM ET

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says he spoke to Donald Trump Monday night after the president-elect shared plans to use his first day in office to slap 25 percent tariffs on Canada.

"It was a good call," Trudeau said this morning on Parliament Hill. "We obviously talked about laying out the facts, talking about how the intense and effective connections between our two countries flow back and forth."

Last night on Truth Social, Trump shared his first-day priorities.

"As everyone is aware, thousands of people are pouring through Mexico and Canada, bringing Crime and Drugs at levels never seen before," Trump wrote.

"On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25% Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States, and its ridiculous Open Borders."

The move would hit more than $400 billion worth of annual Canadian exports to the United States.
Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland and Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc released a statement Monday night to stress that border security is their top priority.

"Law enforcement agencies from our respective countries … work together every single day to disrupt the scourge of fentanyl coming from China and other countries," said Freeland, who chairs a special Cabinet committee focused on bilateral relations in face of Trump 2.0.

Trudeau said he'd convene a meeting with his provincial counterparts this week to discuss the United States. "There's work to do but we know how to do it."

The rest is politics and the Art of the Deal.
 
Back
Top