On or about May 22 of 2007 I recieved a speeding ticket on my way to work, 63 in a 55. Everyone I have mentioned this to was dumbfounded but from a legal standpoint all the court is going to care about is evidence.
Of which I have none, other than a clean driving record for about 20 years (I'm 49)
I have had a couple of speeding tickets in my youth; I earned them and paid them. I like to think that I am a very patient and reasonable man but an infraction so trite I personally take as offense, I feel it smacks of abuse.
Are there mitigating circumstances such as following the flow of traffic that can offer to a judge the reasonable preponderance of innocence in the face of unquestionable guilt based on a digital laser/radar device against my analog speedometer?
Of which I have none, other than a clean driving record for about 20 years (I'm 49)
I have had a couple of speeding tickets in my youth; I earned them and paid them. I like to think that I am a very patient and reasonable man but an infraction so trite I personally take as offense, I feel it smacks of abuse.
Are there mitigating circumstances such as following the flow of traffic that can offer to a judge the reasonable preponderance of innocence in the face of unquestionable guilt based on a digital laser/radar device against my analog speedometer?
