Recent content by zddoodah

Again: I suggest getting in front of this by having a sit down with all of your firm's shareholders/"partners" and an attorney. It also seems like you may have some issues with your father not acting in the firm's best interests. If so, that's a separate legal issue about which you...

This seems to be saying two different things. Taking time off to provide for your wife's care is certainly covered by FMLA. However, I don't understand the first part of this sentence. Visiting her family members isn't something that's going to be covered. DISREGARD...I misread. @cbg will...

You didn't say whether the letter you received came from the client or a lawyer. If it's the former, I suggest getting in front of this by having a sit down with all of your firm's shareholders/"partners" and an attorney. If it's the latter, then there is even more urgency.

Just FYI, misappropriation is more than malpractice. Malpractice is negligence. Misappropriation is the civil analog of theft. By the way, assuming that the real claim is misappropriation, the reason to throw in malpractice is to get your insurance involved. Insurance will cover negligence...

Unless you can compose that post in something that better resembles coherent English, I can only suggest that you seek advice from an immigration attorney.

Same thing. An alleged overbilling is a valid basis for a dispute.

Being improperly charged twice is a valid reason. For the company you said you rented from, no.

Probably not, but maybe. Impossible to be certain without a thorough review of assets.

If you're creating a revocable trust in which you and your wife are both grantors and trustees, there's likely no benefit while you're both alive. While you might have assets titled to the trust while you're alive, the trust would be disregarded for virtually all purposes. The benefit of that...

You're free to dispute the charge with your credit card issuer. Did you really not know that?

You're communicating with anonymous strangers who may or may not be lawyers, who may or may not be in the relevant state, and who may or may not have any relevant legal knowledge. NOT a good place for complex legal issues. Registered? I assume this doesn't mean anything other than that your...

We? At this point, you stopped using punctuation and started haphazardly capitalizing words, so your post became unintelligible. I tried looking but didn't see any sort of question, so I'm unsure what the purpose of your post is.

That law does not apply to single-family residences as long as the owner is not a corporation, a REIT or other such entity and the tenants have been given statutory notice that it isn't applicable. Civil Code section 1947.12(d)(5). Since the OP said his/her family members are "renting a...

So? Lots of "theys" and "thems" without clear antecedents here. Without some explanation about these "large items," I'm not sure what you expect anyone to make of this. Ok...the tenants are free to deny access if the landlord doesn't comply with Civil Code section 1954. I don't understand...

Then why did you give him your driver's license? And did he give it back? If so, then you have no basis for any legal action. Also, your post is curiously silent about whether you actually did or didn't run the stop sign. I disagree. Based on your story, this person made zero effort to...