Recent content by zddoodah

I'm aware of all that, but you didn't answer my question. You wrote that you think that, "if [you're] going to record someone for the purpose of making money, [you] do have to have a signed release." I asked why you think that is true. OK...so right of publicity. Under what state's law...

HIPAA is a law governing medical providers, so it's not relevant to what you described. I don't see anything that supports a defamation claim. Beyond that, she needs to retain the services of a family law attorney to help with the divorce. It's not clear if your friend is currently in the...

Why do you think that? It's not true. Could sue? Sure. Anyone could sue anyone for anything. What cause(s) of action do you suppose might be alleged?

^^^ This...100% I hope he didn't say this. It's ok to say that you have a strong case, but results cannot EVER be guaranteed. There may be many pretrial hearings, and you don't necessarily need to attend all of them. Discuss this with your attorney.

Your lawyer is the best person to answer this question because the answer depends on a lot of information you didn't (and shouldn't) share with us. This is a garbled and somewhat unintelligible sentence. I'm curious about your use of the term "trials" in the plural. Generally, there is only...

I assume "the family" means the woman's daughter and son-in-law. Why did you "have to" do this? "We"? FWIW, nothing you have described is elder abuse. Your post doesn't really raise any legal issue, except that the woman appears to be the tenant of her daughter and son-in-law. If they...

That's why I wrote, "if . . . their father made a big stink over this." So far, all we know is that the father "is claiming that I scheduled the appointments during his custody time." Not only do we not know exactly what that means, we don't know what the father has done or intends to do, if...

This is as clear as a bell. Your custodial time begins at 3:10 p.m. Then it makes no sense for you to have asked, "technically, which of us is correct[?]" Given that May is three months away, this is what should have been done anyway. That said, since the kids obviously aren't with their...

You can issue anything you like. Did you really think the answer might be otherwise? Did you interview someone? Did someone interview you? What were the circumstances of the interview? What was the "public setting"? Who is "the person"? Was the person who made the recording either the...

I agree with what "adjusterjack" wrote and would add the following: The general rule is that an offer is not binding unless the offeree has accepted the offer or, in some circumstances, has acted in detrimental reliance on the offer. Additionally, if the offer was based on a certain set of...

This thread is over two years old. Resurrecting it is of no value to anyone.

So...your only question is whether there is a legal obligation to use snail mail? If so, the answer is no.

I'm not quite sure what the question is now. Part of the sale process will (or should) be that the title company that will issue the buyer's policy of title insurance will review the transaction. Part of that review will be a review of the trust instrument for the 50% owner trust and approval...

Did you ask for that? If not, why not? If so, what response did you receive? Concur. In the absence of any significant injury, you aren't getting anything more than a token payment or charges comped.

So...a false statement of fact overrides the default "as is" rule. However, saying that a car is "in perfect working order" isn't really a statement of fact. The things you mentioned don't necessarily give you a valid claim, but you certainly can give small claims court a shot.