Pebble
New Member
- Jurisdiction
- North Dakota
I am asking for general legal direction only. I am not posting names, addresses, docket numbers, screenshots, or documents because this is a public forum.
I am in North Dakota. I am trying to determine what type of attorney should review a situation involving suspected forged signatures or unauthorized legal documents, possible misuse of personal identifying information, and possible unauthorized access to personal electronic devices or online accounts.
Some of the documents I am concerned about may involve affidavits, waiver-style documents, power-of-attorney-style documents, or other records that could affect personal rights or identity. I also have concerns about whether personal identifying information from prior public filings may have been misused by private individuals.
My main question is whether this should be approached as a civil-rights issue, or whether I should first consult a fraud/forgery attorney, identity-theft attorney, cyber/privacy attorney, or landlord-tenant attorney.
What facts or documents would usually be needed before a civil-rights attorney could determine whether there is a viable civil-rights claim?
I am in North Dakota. I am trying to determine what type of attorney should review a situation involving suspected forged signatures or unauthorized legal documents, possible misuse of personal identifying information, and possible unauthorized access to personal electronic devices or online accounts.
Some of the documents I am concerned about may involve affidavits, waiver-style documents, power-of-attorney-style documents, or other records that could affect personal rights or identity. I also have concerns about whether personal identifying information from prior public filings may have been misused by private individuals.
My main question is whether this should be approached as a civil-rights issue, or whether I should first consult a fraud/forgery attorney, identity-theft attorney, cyber/privacy attorney, or landlord-tenant attorney.
What facts or documents would usually be needed before a civil-rights attorney could determine whether there is a viable civil-rights claim?