Search results

Is it too late to get you nominated? You are probably more capable than either of them.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a cripple (sorry - disabled), wracked with pain on a daily basis throughout his Presidency, yet he successfuly brought the US through post-Depression Era recovery and most of World War II. Just sayin'.

Of course it's not "LEGAL." Did it harm you? No. What do you want to do, make a federal case out of it? Every hear of "No Harm, No Foul"? smh

Clear your land? No, I don't think so. But I think you have an obligation to at least trim the branches occasionally to keep them away from the power lines.

You're citing the New York Post? LOL.

"Typical"? Dunno. Could be a mistake, could be intentional. Have your Dr write up a revised return to work report and submit it. You have a month to get it resolved. No biggie.

You didn't say that earlier. That may give you a cause of action for a private nuisance lawsuit. But that's a bit iffy. Do you have copies of the lease between C and B and the HOA rules that actually use the phrase "orderliness of the neighborhood." I ask because I read thousands of posts where...

Here's my guess as to why two attorneys would not take the case. A "step" is not a "hazard" that requires elimination or remediation. Millions of stores and businesses and homes have one or more "steps" that are safely negotiated every day without any warning signs. In fact, by your own...

I reopened the original thread for further discussion if you like. You and TC were having an interesting tete a tete.

Reopened for further discussion since Chevron has been overturned. See: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf

And you only get to sue for the cost of repairing the damage to YOUR property that was done by Tenant B. Since Tenant B is your only defendant your choice of venue is where the defendant is located or where the matter arose (which is also where Tenant B is located). Any damage to Tenant A's...

It might make a difference. It suggests that there might have been a previous court order that had to be quashed or amended. Zigner raises an important point. You're going to have to explain things better. If this is a child support issue, you should consult an attorney.

I think this thread has run its course. Locked.

Why is this even something to fight over? Is everybody in your company 12 years old?

1 - This is the right forum. 2 - You should never have signed the quitclaim without money in hand. 3 - Sorry to have to say this but if you don't understand the legal stuff happening in California, you need to consult with a California attorney.

You need to study the NM Rules of Civil Procedure before you move forward with the lawsuit. https://casetext.com/rule/new-mexico-court-rules/new-mexico-rules-of-civil-procedure-for-the-district-courts Otherwise you are likely to make more mistakes that will get you dismissed again.

They can. As long as it's video, you have no expectation of privacy while employed. There are likely no cameras in restrooms. Depends on how long? You could be fired for being away from your post for excessive amounts of time. If you have a disability, you need to ask for an accommodation...

plutoforlyfe, do you have a question?

The mother would have to get a court order changing the custody/visitation. Without a court order, father gets the child while mother is in jail. However, in order to be able to enforce his rights, he should petition the court for an official change in custody if the mother becomes incarcerated.