<div class="bbWrapper"><blockquote data-attributes="member: 118845" data-quote="zddoodah" data-source="post: 332088"
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-title">
<a href="/goto/post?id=332088"
class="bbCodeBlock-sourceJump"
rel="nofollow"
data-xf-click="attribution"
data-content-selector="#post-332088">zddoodah said:</a>
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
The attorney-client privilege is a rule of evidence, not an ethical rule, and the link cited in the prior response contains only incidental references to the attorney-client privilege. Rule 5.502 of the <a href="https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/ACO/CourtRulesChapter/06-30-2014.5.pdf" target="_blank" class="link link--external" data-proxy-href="/proxy.php?link=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.legis.iowa.gov%2Fdocs%2FACO%2FCourtRulesChapter%2F06-30-2014.5.pdf&hash=2f3843df972b8559dc2db7db1db536c0" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">Iowa Rules of Evidence</a> discusses the attorney-client privilege
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Georgia'">While correct, justblue did link the Iowa attorney Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC), and Rule 32:1.6 does cover the attorney's duty of confidentiality to his/her client. The two rules are different in scope and the consequences of a violation by the attorney of either rule are different as well. I mention this because most in the public, and perhaps the OP, don't understand the various rules of attorney-client confidentiality and in my experience when a non-lawyer uses the phrase "attorney-client privilege" they more often really are referring to the duty of confidentiality. </span></div>