You are correct, but you may as well have said "ALL" states have horrific records with regard to child services, because that is the case, as we have found out doing months of research on this.
Here is something you may find interesting, also. When we went to court on this matter in Feb. (just a couple of weeks ago), to appeal the father's petition for custody, the father did NOT appear in court. He just failed to show up...no explanation. As he was listed on the docket as the ONLY respondent, one would assume that would be grounds for dismissal and to have the children returned to me.
Unfortunately, the DCS case worker and attorney for DCS showed up AGAIN to represent the state in a matter they did not file. They convinced the judge that (despite there being no docket numbers or any petition that anyone has actually seen filed with the clerk of court's office) that they had filed a petition in "conjunction" with the father's private party petition. This was after my husband informed the DCS attorney that they had no business being in the courtroom, since the DCS commissioner had issued a statement of non-involvement. That took the wind out of her sails for a few seconds, but when she bounced back, she tried to convince the judge that
a) I could not be appointed an attorney because I "badmouthed" the last one. (the judge almost laughed at her) and....
b) that we had not filed our appeal in a "timely fashion"....which is amusing, since the appeal was filed before the final order of the court was even filed. Apparently, she thought she could snag it up on the "court order" they filed afterwards from their own office...saying I hadn't filed an appeal to THAT one. Again, the judge waved her off...granted my motion for counsel to be appointed, and continued the matter to March 19.
That was about the gist of it....other than we met briefly with the new court appointed attorney after court, and he, too, is paying NO attention to the facts of the matter. That much became painfully clear this morning, when we received an email from him, saying that after reviewing our case, he felt the "state" had sufficient reason for removing my children. He said my best plan of action is to re-establish visition and "make a case" for the return of custody of my children, since they are not planning to terminate parental rights at this point, because they are with a family member (the biological father).
There are SO many things wrong with this statement, it's too frustrating for me to go into, but a good example of how LITTLE this man paid attention to detail is that he referred to my husband and I as "Mr. and Mrs. Anderson" in his email.....um....that is NOT our name....and that wasn't even MY name at the time my children were removed from my home. We met this man in person, introduced ourselves to him, have sent him multiple emails signed with our REAL name and have left him phone messages asking him to call us back, leaving our real name, and yet, he addressed his email to the wrong people? Basically, he is telling us in this email, that he doesn't want to fight the "state" on this matter, especially as a court appointed attorney, so he won't help us. It seems we are back to square one, and left to represent ourselves.
Here is something you may find interesting, also. When we went to court on this matter in Feb. (just a couple of weeks ago), to appeal the father's petition for custody, the father did NOT appear in court. He just failed to show up...no explanation. As he was listed on the docket as the ONLY respondent, one would assume that would be grounds for dismissal and to have the children returned to me.
Unfortunately, the DCS case worker and attorney for DCS showed up AGAIN to represent the state in a matter they did not file. They convinced the judge that (despite there being no docket numbers or any petition that anyone has actually seen filed with the clerk of court's office) that they had filed a petition in "conjunction" with the father's private party petition. This was after my husband informed the DCS attorney that they had no business being in the courtroom, since the DCS commissioner had issued a statement of non-involvement. That took the wind out of her sails for a few seconds, but when she bounced back, she tried to convince the judge that
a) I could not be appointed an attorney because I "badmouthed" the last one. (the judge almost laughed at her) and....
b) that we had not filed our appeal in a "timely fashion"....which is amusing, since the appeal was filed before the final order of the court was even filed. Apparently, she thought she could snag it up on the "court order" they filed afterwards from their own office...saying I hadn't filed an appeal to THAT one. Again, the judge waved her off...granted my motion for counsel to be appointed, and continued the matter to March 19.
That was about the gist of it....other than we met briefly with the new court appointed attorney after court, and he, too, is paying NO attention to the facts of the matter. That much became painfully clear this morning, when we received an email from him, saying that after reviewing our case, he felt the "state" had sufficient reason for removing my children. He said my best plan of action is to re-establish visition and "make a case" for the return of custody of my children, since they are not planning to terminate parental rights at this point, because they are with a family member (the biological father).
There are SO many things wrong with this statement, it's too frustrating for me to go into, but a good example of how LITTLE this man paid attention to detail is that he referred to my husband and I as "Mr. and Mrs. Anderson" in his email.....um....that is NOT our name....and that wasn't even MY name at the time my children were removed from my home. We met this man in person, introduced ourselves to him, have sent him multiple emails signed with our REAL name and have left him phone messages asking him to call us back, leaving our real name, and yet, he addressed his email to the wrong people? Basically, he is telling us in this email, that he doesn't want to fight the "state" on this matter, especially as a court appointed attorney, so he won't help us. It seems we are back to square one, and left to represent ourselves.