Credit help in dismissing case

Purge07 said:
But what if I subpoena information at beginning and what they also give is false representation as well?
Click to expand...
But what if the new information they give you is NOT "false representation", just like the documents currently in your possession?

Saying it over and over again doesn't make it true.
 
It hasn't started yet. Payrollhr, I am asking for advice. A date has not been assigned yet for court appearance.
 
Last edited:
Purge07 said:
It hasn't started yet.
Click to expand...

Would have been nice to know this from the very start. If no lawsuit has been filed, then there's nothing to dismiss and no "evidence" yet. Every document that your creditor has generated is "fabricated" in the sense that it's a document that your creditor created.

I'm quite at a loss at this point to understand what you're seeking out of this thread.
 
Purge07 said:
It hasn't started yet. Payrollhr, I am asking for advice. A date has not been assigned yet for court appearance.
Click to expand...
Ok, so you HAVE been served with a lawsuit? If you have, then the case HAS started.
 
The only thing plaintiff did was submit the exhibit a to the court system attached to the summons. The document that was altered and incorrect. It hasn't to the point of no court date yet for case.
 
Purge07 said:
The only thing plaintiff did was submit the exhibit a to the court system attached to the summons. The document that was altered and incorrect. It hasn't to the point of no court date yet for case.
Click to expand...

So now prepare to present evidence to counter their evidence in court. I hope you've got something more than complaining about the appearance of the document.
 
No but isn't false representation a defense besides the defense of payments and dispute the amount of debt defense which I also have. With the proof of the actual amounts for the last years worth of balances.
 
Purge07 said:
The only thing plaintiff did was submit the exhibit a to the court system attached to the summons. The document that was altered and incorrect. It hasn't to the point of no court date yet for case.
Click to expand...

If the plaintiff is submitting things to the court there must have been a lawsuit filed with the court.
 
Purge07 said:
No but isn't false representation a defense
Click to expand...
Not in and of itself.
besides the defense of payments and dispute the amount of debt defense which I also have. With the proof of the actual amounts for the last years worth of balances.
Click to expand...
Yes, that is what I've been talking about in your thread. You take the evidence you have of what the original balance is and what your payments have been, then factor in the interest and legal fees, and present that as your defense in court. If you can show that you've paid in full, then you win. If not, then you lose and it's simply a matter of what the actual balance due is.

Nothing you have presented here indicates that you have grounds for a dismissal.
 
Purge07 said:
According to payment defense: it states whether in full or a payment has been made and not registered.
Click to expand...
AGAIN:
If you can prove that payment in full was made, then you will win the suit.
If you can prove that partial payment was made, then the amount they are awarded will be reduced.
Neither allows for the case to be "dismissed".
 
Purge07 said:
It hasn't started yet.
Click to expand...

Purge07 said:
The only thing plaintiff did was submit the exhibit a to the court system attached to the summons. The document that was altered and incorrect. It hasn't to the point of no court date yet for case.
Click to expand...

You can't seem to make up your mind, can you? If the plaintiff is submitting things to the court, then your statement that "It hasn't started yet" is apparently untrue, which gets back to my question about the procedural posture of the case. What is the procedural posture of the case -- i.e., what is the status of the case?

Purge07 said:
No but isn't false representation a defense besides the defense of payments and dispute the amount of debt defense which I also have. With the proof of the actual amounts for the last years worth of balances.
Click to expand...

I have no real idea what these sentences mean (in fact, neither of these are complete sentences). You'll need to be far more articulate when writing documents that you submit to the court or in presenting your case.

As I said before, every document prepared by the plaintiff is "fabricated" in the sense that it was created by the plaintiff. If you dispute the plaintiff's allegations about the balance due, then you'll presumably testify and offer other evidence to that effect, but none of this is going to get your case dismissed.

I've completely lost track of what you're actually claiming, but if you believe you owe some amount -- even if it's not the amount claimed by the plaintiff -- then your efforts are probably best directed toward trying to settle the case.
 
The OP hopes that the crappy quality of the documents submitted will get the case dismissed.
 

Share this page

Get a free case review from a lawyer
Back
Top