Hi,
I recently went to an employee of my university to confide in him about another student who committed a crime against me (sexual assault). I didn't want to share the student's name, but the person I spoke to said he just wanted to have the name on file in case it happened again and that it would be completely confidential. He told me only he and one other employee would see the name and that it was only to have on record, and that no action would be taken against the student. So, I reluctantly gave him the name.
On Monday I had a meeting where I was surprised to find that he had in fact shared the name and details of the incident with the head of Judicial Affairs, who said she is now obligated to confront the individual. This is the last thing I want, and I have expressed this. My position is that they obtained the information through unethical and possibly illegal means, by deliberately misleading me into thinking it would be confidential. My goal is to stop the confrontation from happening; however I have also offered up a compromise in which instead of a one-on-one meeting with the individual, Judicial Affairs would require his entire fraternity to have a workshop about sexual assault, so that he and all his brothers would hear this very important information but he would not know that I had specifically reported him. However, they refused.
Did my university break a law, and do I have a leg to stand on in asking them to keep this confrontation from taking place?
Thank you.
I recently went to an employee of my university to confide in him about another student who committed a crime against me (sexual assault). I didn't want to share the student's name, but the person I spoke to said he just wanted to have the name on file in case it happened again and that it would be completely confidential. He told me only he and one other employee would see the name and that it was only to have on record, and that no action would be taken against the student. So, I reluctantly gave him the name.
On Monday I had a meeting where I was surprised to find that he had in fact shared the name and details of the incident with the head of Judicial Affairs, who said she is now obligated to confront the individual. This is the last thing I want, and I have expressed this. My position is that they obtained the information through unethical and possibly illegal means, by deliberately misleading me into thinking it would be confidential. My goal is to stop the confrontation from happening; however I have also offered up a compromise in which instead of a one-on-one meeting with the individual, Judicial Affairs would require his entire fraternity to have a workshop about sexual assault, so that he and all his brothers would hear this very important information but he would not know that I had specifically reported him. However, they refused.
Did my university break a law, and do I have a leg to stand on in asking them to keep this confrontation from taking place?
Thank you.