Sounds Familiar!
Yep! That sounds just about the same way I learned a very valuable lesson about litigation which was not to rely on a verbal agreement with the opposing factions and to get every stipulation in writing come what may. But the big difference here is that the law firm you dealt with or are still dealing with including the attorney in question have also committed out and out fraud and you should (I personally hope) absolutely take them to task on this one and not let them slip under the radar.
This is what took place…
The law firm files suit via attorney of record on behalf of the credit card company and serves you with the summon and the complaint in response to which you call the attorney and make a payment plan of so much dollars per month for so many months; an agreement which you honored fully. You were then fed a line by an absolute shyster (who I hesitate to even call an attorney) that as long as you kept up payments you did not have to worry about the lawsuit, when what he should have said instead and actually proceeded to do was to dismiss the case with prejudice.
Well, not only did the attorney NOT dismiss the case, he waits thirty days and then applies to the court for a default judgment claiming that you had not appeared in the case and had failed to answer the complaint (which was technically true). The motion is granted and a default judgment is accordingly entered into court records against you at around the 90-day mark.
You can of course file with the court a motion to vacate the default judgment which under the scenario you have outlined is going to be a slam dunk and definitely granted. Another more pressing matter than the judgment showing up on your credit report is if in fact the default judgment was recorded with your locale's County Recorder's Office as a lien called an Abstract of Judgment. Because while an Abstract of Judgment can be cancelled or recalled, its actual foot print can never, ever be erased from the county records. So if it has been recorded with the county, there will be an entry as evidence of it having been recorded and then another evidencing its cancellation.
You might want to check on that.
fredrikklaw