mightymoose
Moderator
The 496 charge likely arose from the fact that he was driving a car that was stolen. It is low hanging fruit at the time of the arrest.
The prosecutor will have a lot more information when it comes time to get an indictment.
Yes, it is extremely common for the DA to modify the initial charges submitted by the police. For the reasons above, 496 and 487 are very weak under the known circumstances. 496 is the goto charge for the arrest- the only detail the police would have is that the vehicle was reported as stolen and this was the person who had it. The manner in which it was actually obtained will be reviewed later, and it does seem the 10855 fits best, and only because of its 5 day rule. That rule negates any lame excuses that may have been offered for why the vehicle wasn't returned on time.
I did see a good faith defense in the jury instruction, but it wouldn't fit this scenario.
I imagine this happens more than I realize, but it is new to me. We hand off just about everything vehicle related, including DUI, to the chippies. They like the stats and we like less paperwork.