-
Welcome to our legal community! Click here or the create new topic button to ask a question and receive answers and comments from our friendly and helpful legal community.
Articles that answer frequent legal questions are in our Law Guide. Important legal news is reported in The Law JournalYou can find a lawyer near you in the Lawyer Directory. If you know that you need to hire an attorney, you can submit a case review from a lawyer.
It's not just the "Left of the Center"
- Thread Starter justblue
- Start date
- Status
Redemptionman
Well-Known Member
I am sure lots of NEOcon Industrial war complex generals support Harris and the DEMS. It keeps them in money and the wars a going. Trump and Vance will smeer the demo donkeys come debate time. Don't worry.
army judge
Super Moderator
You make absolutely no sense.
With that said. You are entitled to your beliefs, and I am entitled to mine. That is, and should be, what the United States stands for...Correct?
Redemptionman
Well-Known Member
Oh yeah, sure thing. When the commie leftists don't work out for you. Don't come a knocking in my neck of the woods. We have all the bullets, food supplies, and farm land we need to be self sustained.
Not sure what will happen to the inner cities and don't care.
Don't you go worrying your angry little head about it. Under no circumstances would I ever go to your "neck of the woods".
Redemptionman
Well-Known Member
Good because we love our Red state, just as much as Texas loves theirs.
Not angry, I am confident that Trump will be re elected to finish out his term as intended before the liberals released a virus upon the world to change all the great things happening in our country. Noble Californian's and West coasters are fleeing the liberal brain drain zones so fast that Texas, Arkansas, and Tennessee property values have doubled and tripled. All the evacuees say the same-thing that liberal policies are unsustainable.
Tax Counsel
Well-Known Member
I doubt that. First, at the moment, the rumblings from the Trump camp suggest he'll skip the debate that is already scheduled. IMO a good choice because Trump isn't that good at live debates and debating a woman of color may be very challenging for Trump given his tendancy to mock or belittle women and minorities. Even if he managed to control his impulses to do that, the man tends to ramble when speaking off the cuff, which isn't impressive to a debate audience. He has to hope that Harris is even worse at this than he is.
Tax Counsel
Well-Known Member
You apparently didn't pay much attention to how Covid started and spread. The virus originated in the Wuhan area of China. Not a very good staging place for a group wanting to hurt Americans or change American politics. The odds of it having exactly the desired political effect are really, really low. A lot of things would have had to fall in place just right, and of course that's not what happened.
Moreover, Covid begain while Trump was in office. It first appeared in China in December 2019 and first detected in the U.S. the following month. That gave Trump a great opening to improve his standing with the public if he handled the crisis very well. That's not the sort of thing his opponents would want to give him. I give him a mixed record on Covid. As a result, I don't see Covid as the make or break issue in the 2020 election.
China fumbled the ball by trying to bury the new of the virus in the hope that it would just go away on its own and thus not sully China's reputation. The slow reaction by the Chinese government showed that it learned very little from the deadly but thankfully less communicable SARS virus that started in China 20 years ago. The delay by the Chinese government in taking action to fight both virus outbreaks made both of them much worse than had the government acted promptly to contain the spread.
It wasn't "liberals" that released the Covid virus. It orginated in a Chinese wildlife market, i.e. a market that sold wild animals. The conditions of those markets are ideal for creating this kind of problem. This isn't something new; previous disease outbreaks in China have been traced to these markets. Yet the Chinese government did nothing to eliminate them or at least impose a lot stricter standards on them. If you want to point the finger of blame for Covid on someone, put it on the Chinese Communist Party.
See the CDC page COVID-19 Timeline that goes through the events of Covid in detail.
Redemptionman
Well-Known Member
I suggest you read Fauci's book, the same guy who killed foster kids with HIV experiments also donated over 1 million dollars to the Wuhan China lab where they grew and experimented on the Covid SARS virus. This virus came about as an intentional or unintentional lab leak and it had the effect of influencing a US election. It could have come at any time but the timing of it coincided with the US 2020 election.
Gain of function research and DNA manipulated vaccines is Fauci's MO, and he gained financially from it. As far as the debate goes Trump will be prepared for the lowest rated democratic candidate to not receive a vote and dropped out of the running for President. Harris can not do an unscripted interview and will fall flat. Vance is an attorney and will own Walz on every issue. Trump while not a great debater will still be able to out do her on every issue. So, I am confident that Trump will do quite well or at least well enough to convince some swing people that they should vote for him.
Gain of function research and DNA manipulated vaccines is Fauci's MO, and he gained financially from it. As far as the debate goes Trump will be prepared for the lowest rated democratic candidate to not receive a vote and dropped out of the running for President. Harris can not do an unscripted interview and will fall flat. Vance is an attorney and will own Walz on every issue. Trump while not a great debater will still be able to out do her on every issue. So, I am confident that Trump will do quite well or at least well enough to convince some swing people that they should vote for him.
That is unlikely.
Be careful of what you wish for.
Or the shorter version
---Kamala Harris
I wonder if you can explain what she means by this phrase or by what the actual phrase means and if you think is originally her's? I would like to know.
army judge
Super Moderator
Her "word slaw" has been examined and explained!
Enjoy!
Vice President Kamala Harris actually said this: "We have the ability to see what can be, unburdened by what has been, and then to make the possible actually happen".
The part of the statement "by what has been" refers to the democracy and freedom in this country since the passage of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
This message seemed to be only "word salad" from the vice president as she often talks in words that defy logical interpretation, but this remark should not be taken lightly since it comes from the playbook ("The Communist Manifesto") of none other than Karl Marx, the infamous socialist revolutionist. A believer that capitalism stands for social destruction.
Much of Harris's thoughts come naturally from her father; a Marxist leaning economist that taught at Stanford University and was educated at University of California Berkeley. Her contempt for free market economy and radical racism are the first beginnings of socialism that has never worked in a free society.
Counterpoint:Kamala Harris is ready to be president. Her life story and achievements are two reasons
The unequivocal notion that this country could survive as a world leader for freedom under a Harris presidency is unthinkable.
x.com
Don Forte, Nashville 37221
"It is time for us to do what we have been doing. And that time is every day. Every day it is time for us to agree that there are things and tools that are available to us.."
Does Kamala Harris remind you more of Selina Meyer or George Constanza? pic.twitter.com/pDRmAFUt34
— X Strategies LLC (@XStrategiesLLC)
January 13, 2022Does Kamala Harris remind you more of Selina Meyer or George Constanza? pic.twitter.com/pDRmAFUt34
— X Strategies LLC (@XStrategiesLLC)
"I am here, standing here on the northern flank, on the eastern flank, talking about what we have in terms of the eastern flank."
"Ukraine is a country in Europe. It exists next to another country called Russia. Russia is a bigger country. Russia is a powerful country. Russia decided to invade a smaller country called Ukraine. So basically, that's wrong."
"We are announcing today also that we will assist Jamaica in COVID recovery by assisting in terms of the recovery efforts in Jamaica that have been essential to I believe what is necessary to strengthen not only the issue of public health but also of the economy."
"I have a motto: I drink- I eat and drink 'no' for breakfast."
KAMALA HARRIS: "Do not come. The United States will continue to enforce our laws and secure our border...We, as one of our priorities, will discourage illegal migration, and I believe if you come to our border you will be turned back."
"Talking about the significance of the passage of time, right, the significance of the passage of time, so when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time."
"This virus, it has no eyes — and yet, it knows exactly how we see each other, and how we treat each other."
Kamala Harris, accepting the Democratic nomination for vice president, passed on an important message about equality. pic.twitter.com/ZhlHB9ctj9
— Brut America (@brutamerica)
August 20, 2020
Redemptionman
Well-Known Member
Karl Marx is a hoot, a rich guy who lived off other peoples money telling the poor, disadvantaged, and losers of the capitalistic competition environment that there is this great socialist method which can pull you out of poverty and economic situation. It is funny how economics which can be considered an art is treated these days. I possess a BBA and a MBA, but Marx theory was taught as nothing more than a footnote. Something that was considered to be laughed upon, and not taken seriously. Then again Economic degrees can be science based, also has a liberal arts component. It is this component that has been exploited by people like Marx to justify their poor performance, and lack of wanting to compete in a competitive environment. Lenin loved Marx, I am sure that other communist leaders such as Castro loved him as well. it justifies the ruling class over seeing a large group of poorly educated, noncompetitive losers just will to go along in life. These leaders create a group dependent upon them to remain in power, I am not shocked that Democrats has adopted their philosophy.
It really is scary times in the USA, this election is important to the future of our country in more ways than one.
It really is scary times in the USA, this election is important to the future of our country in more ways than one.
Judge, I knew all of that. I wanted to know what stealthy1 would say and what he/she knew. I doubt he/she knew that it came from ("The Communist Manifesto") of none other than Karl Marx,
I have read scores of articles on how that phrase has been interpreted over the years and, in addition to what your posted, there is a consensus that as a society, we should abandon our societal norms, morals, and mores. That, in the US, includes abandoning the Constitution.
Harris has used that phrase at least 60 times since becoming VP and recently said, on the campaign trail, that she has not changed her long-standing views despite what she says during the campaign. I believe her. She is at least a Marxist if not a Communist.
A vote for Harris is a vote to destroy the Republic. People like stealthy1 will have to decide if that is what they want to do, destroy the Republic.
Zigner
Well-Known Member
You are confused about both the words and where they came from.
Then explain instead of being cryptic.
Redemptionman
Well-Known Member
It comes from inherited wealth, unburdened by what has been. It is a reference to wealth which was not earned but benefited from being passed down upon by generations. I did look it up. This might be why they are so eager to tax capital gains and potential unrealized capital gains. Right now it only affects transactions over 100M dollars but would be very easy to change and include everyone.
Zigner
Well-Known Member
Nah.
If you wanna talk "word salad"...
"Well, I would do that, and we're sitting down. You know, I was somebody — we had, Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka, was so impactful on that issue. It's a very important issue.
"But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I'm talking about — that, because look, child care is child care, couldn't — you know, there's something — you have to have it in this country. You have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers that I'm talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they're not used to. But they'll get used to it very quickly. And it's not going to stop them from doing business with us. But they'll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we're talking about, including child care, that it's going to take care. We're going to have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country.
"Because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I'm talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just — that I just told you about. We're going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it's, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers will be taking in.
"We're going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people. And then we'll worry about the rest of the world. Let's help other people. But we're going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It's about make America great again. We have to do it because right now, we're a failing nation. So we'll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you."
- Dotard Don, concerning prioritizing child care.
- Status
Share this page
