cbg
Super Moderator
I'm not saying you don't have an allergy. I'm saying it's quite unlikely that the allergy was CAUSED by the device.
I don't have any problems at all with your wanting allergy testing to be required. That would seem to be a perfectly reasonable suggestion. (Think about it, though - allergy testing before hand only makes sense if I am right that you were already allergic and just hadn't come across the substance, or the right combination of substances to trigger it. If the allergy was caused by your prolonged exposure, how would pre-testing tell you anything?) But I think for something like that, lobbying your elected representatives would be more to the point than railing at a message board because they don't immediately jump on your bandwagon. Your Congresscritter can do a whole lot more towards getting that required testing than we can.
I don't have any problems at all with your wanting allergy testing to be required. That would seem to be a perfectly reasonable suggestion. (Think about it, though - allergy testing before hand only makes sense if I am right that you were already allergic and just hadn't come across the substance, or the right combination of substances to trigger it. If the allergy was caused by your prolonged exposure, how would pre-testing tell you anything?) But I think for something like that, lobbying your elected representatives would be more to the point than railing at a message board because they don't immediately jump on your bandwagon. Your Congresscritter can do a whole lot more towards getting that required testing than we can.