Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wanted to know if the Act, 18 PA C.S.A s9125 is suppose to prevent me as a felon from losing my job of 11years from my employer after a backround check was administered
§ 9125. Use of records for employment.
(a) General rule.--Whenever an employer is in receipt of
information which is part of an employment applicant's criminal
history record information file, it may use that information for
the purpose of deciding whether or not to hire the applicant,
only in accordance with this section.
(b) Use of information.--Felony and misdemeanor convictions
may be considered by the employer only to the extent to which
they relate to the applicant's suitability for employment in the
position for which he has applied.
(c) Notice.--The employer shall notify in writing the
applicant if the decision not to hire the applicant is based in
whole or in part on criminal history record information.
(Dec. 14, 1979, P.L.556, No.127, eff. imd.; June 11, 1982,
P.L.476, No.138, eff. 180 days)
You know.... Disagreeable,
I have read on this board for several years now. I love reading, learning about various issues that people face about the law. I myself went up against a state agency and thru the whole process it was exciting. Better once i won that issue.
You seem to have very low self-esteem.. Because you most always post some bs answer to a perfect question. The question here was simple... your answer was nothing but a personal attack on someone you don't know.
And??? Didn't you read the OP question correctly? Your bold text clearly states....
(b) Use of information.--Felony and misdemeanor convictions
may be considered by the employer only to the extent to which
they relate to the applicant's suitability for employment in the
position for which he has applied. <<<<< APPLIED.. APPLIED FOR??
The op states he has held this position for 11 years already... At least that is what i read. So it does open the door for questions. Did he lie on his application to get this position 11 years ago? Did he get the felony during his employment? Does any of this matter in his case?
Then you have Army Judge that gave a good answer. Did you feel that Army Judge answer wasn't correct and you needed to reply with the BS to make you feel warm and fuzzy? Or did you need it to raise yourself esteem so you can continue thinking your above others? The OP question is one that should have brought out the question i mentioned...
After 11 years, they discovered he was a felon and/ not suitable for the job.
You don't realize how ridiculous that sounds?
As noted originally, there are any number of other reasons to dismiss someone. The law cited only has to do with the hiring process and isn't relevant to this scenario.